linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
Cc: dzickus@redhat.com, pzijlstr@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, bmr@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	minchan@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, jcastillo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Add helper for task stack page overrun checking
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:02:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140904150234.GA6480@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409842224-11847-2-git-send-email-atomlin@redhat.com>

On 09/04, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
>
> +#define task_stack_end_corrupted(task) \
> +		(*(end_of_stack(task)) != STACK_END_MAGIC)

and it is always used along with "tsk != init_task".

But why we exclude swapper/0? Can't we add

	end_of_stack(current) = STACK_END_MAGIC;

somewhere at the start of start_kernel() ?

If not, perhaps this new helper should check "task != &init_task"
itself so that we can simplify its users?

Oleg.

>  
>  static inline int object_is_on_stack(void *obj)
>  {
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> index 8a4e5cb..06c7390 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_stack.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
>  #include <linux/sysctl.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
> -#include <linux/magic.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/setup.h>
>  
> @@ -171,8 +170,8 @@ check_stack(unsigned long ip, unsigned long *stack)
>  			i++;
>  	}
>  
> -	if ((current != &init_task &&
> -		*(end_of_stack(current)) != STACK_END_MAGIC)) {
> +	if (current != &init_task &&
> +		task_stack_end_corrupted(current)) {
>  		print_max_stack();
>  		BUG();
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-04 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-04 14:50 [PATCH 0/2] sched: Always check the integrity of the canary Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-04 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: Add helper for task stack page overrun checking Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-04 15:02   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2014-09-04 15:52     ` Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-04 15:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-04 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: BUG when stack end location is over written Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-04 15:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-04 16:11     ` Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-08 19:23       ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sched: Always check the integrity of the canary Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-08 19:23         ` [PATCH 1/3] init/main.c: Give init_task a canary Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-08 19:23         ` [PATCH 2/3] sched: Add helper for task stack page overrun checking Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-08 19:23         ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: BUG when stack end location is over written Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-09  9:42       ` [PATCH v2 0/3] sched: Always check the integrity of the canary Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-09  9:42         ` [PATCH v2 1/3] init/main.c: Give init_task a canary Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-10  7:26           ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-10 13:29             ` Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-11 12:23               ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-11 14:47                 ` Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-09  9:42         ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sched: Add helper for task stack page overrun checking Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-09  9:42         ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sched: BUG when stack end location is over written Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-11 15:41         ` [PATCH v3 0/3] sched: Always check the integrity of the canary Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-11 15:41           ` [PATCH v3 1/3] init/main.c: Give init_task a canary Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-12  7:28             ` Michael Ellerman
2014-09-11 15:41           ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sched: Add helper for task stack page overrun checking Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-11 15:41           ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sched: BUG when stack end location is over written Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-12  4:06             ` Michael Ellerman
2014-09-12  9:44               ` Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-12 10:58                 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-09-15  2:39                   ` Michael Ellerman
2014-09-12  6:04             ` Michael Ellerman
2014-09-12  9:50               ` Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-11 15:53           ` [PATCH v3 0/3] sched: Always check the integrity of the canary Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-11 15:59             ` Aaron Tomlin
2014-09-11 16:02           ` David Laight
2014-09-11 17:26             ` Chuck Ebbert
2014-09-12  8:43               ` David Laight
2014-09-11 17:44             ` Aaron Tomlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140904150234.GA6480@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
    --cc=bmr@redhat.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jcastillo@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pzijlstr@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).