From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound: aoa: printk replacement
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:37:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140910150749.GA30775@sudip-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hk35b4juw.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 04:43:03PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Wed, 10 Sep 2014 20:02:04 +0530,
> Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 03:57:04PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 19:21 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > as pr_* macros are more preffered over printk, so printk replaced
> > > > with corresponding pr_* macros.
> > >
> > > Are you simply running checkpatch on every file and decided to do
> > > something about it? :)
> > >
> > i am running checkpatch on the patch generated. if i am doing checkpatch
> > cleanups then that i do it only in the staging.
> > only exception : printk .. :)
> >
> > > I'll let Takashi decide whether to take this or not as I no longer care
> > > about this code, but IMHO this changes is completely pointless since you
> > > don't also clean up the code to have a common prefix with #define pr_fmt
> > > and then clean up the callers etc.
> > >
> > i mentioned in the comment that in a future patch we can have pr_fmt,
> > it was not done in this patch since the changes for this patch is
> > generated by a script and not manually.
> > if Takashi accepts this then the next patch will have pr_fmt.
>
> If you're going to work on it, please give a patch series and let me
> merge once. There is no good merit to merge a half-baked piece by
> piece.
>
> Regarding the changes you've made: so far, I've merged two such
> patches just because it's a good exercise for newbies. You've played
> it and experienced it enough. So it's time to go up to a higher
> stage, more "real" fixes.
can you please give me some hint of fixes that can be attempted by
newbies. except printk :)
so far i have started with fixing the sparse warnings in staging.
>
> For example, if you are still interested in printk stuff, try to
> change the calls to dev_err() and co. Of course, this needs more
> understanding of the code you'll handle, which object is passed for
> which messages.
>
sure , i will send you this one.
thanks
sudip
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-10 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-10 13:51 [PATCH] sound: aoa: printk replacement Sudip Mukherjee
2014-09-10 13:57 ` Johannes Berg
2014-09-10 14:32 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2014-09-10 14:43 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-09-10 15:07 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2014-09-10 15:38 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-09-10 17:14 ` Sudip Mukherjee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140910150749.GA30775@sudip-PC \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).