From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, timur@tabi.org,
perex@perex.cz, Li.Xiubo@freescale.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: don't change the root clock rate of spdif in driver
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:24:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140917022440.GA3216@Asurada> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140917013251.GA4796@dragon>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:32:52AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:19:28AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:46:34PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > The spdif root clock may be used by other module or defined with
> > > CLK_SET_RATE_GATE, so we can't change the clock rate in driver.
> > > In this patch remove the clk_set_rate and clk_round_rate to protect the
> > > clock.
> >
> > It's a quite convenient and conservative way to remove the clock
> > dealing code in the driver, however, it may result less flexible
> > functionalities.
> >
> > The reason why I left the clk_set_rate() in the driver is to hope
> > we may find a better way to tackle those tough situations. For IP
> > itself, it doesn't matter if the clock the SoC provides to it is
> > being shared by other modules or not.
> >
> > So I think, if it's a shared clock, we should not define it as a
> > rate-changeable one in the SoC level, as we might still have some
> > SoCs provide a dedicated clock to S/PDIF so as to get the maximum
> > range of clock support for users.
> >
> > @Shawn
> > Sorry to involve you in this topic. I'm not so sure if we can do
> > this in the clock driver so that the clock rate would be fixed
> > even if the driver is trying to change it. If we can, I think we
> > may use a better solution here instead.
>
> No, we do not have anything like that today.
It's not supported in the clock API or just not implemented in our
code? Can we just register a clock without CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT to
achieve the purpose? (We are just trying to fix those PRED and PODF
dividers when the driver calls set_rate to their GATE clock.)
Thank you
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-17 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-16 11:46 [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: don't change the root clock rate of spdif in driver Shengjiu Wang
2014-09-16 18:19 ` Nicolin Chen
2014-09-16 18:32 ` Mark Brown
2014-09-17 1:32 ` Shawn Guo
2014-09-17 2:24 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2014-09-17 2:31 ` Shawn Guo
2014-09-17 2:50 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140917022440.GA3216@Asurada \
--to=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=Li.Xiubo@freescale.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@freescale.com \
--cc=timur@tabi.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).