linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@kvack.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	scottwood@freescale.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: fsl-spi: Allow dynamic allocation of CPM1 parameter RAM
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 15:44:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141003144420.GC24441@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141003125609.5BEA11AB276@localhost.localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 752 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:56:09PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:

> +config CPM1_RELOCSPI
> +	bool "Dynamic SPI relocation"
> +	default n
> +	help
> +	  On recent MPC8xx (at least MPC866 and MPC885) SPI can be relocated
> +	  without micropatch. This activates relocation to a dynamically
> +	  allocated area in the CPM Dual port RAM.
> +	  When combined with SPI relocation patch (for older MPC8xx) it avoids
> +	  the "loss" of additional Dual port RAM space just above the patch,
> +	  which might be needed for example when using the CPM QMC.

Something like this shouldn't be a compile time option.  Either it
should be unconditional or it should be triggered in some system
specific manner (from DT, from knowing about other users or similar).

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-03 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-03 12:56 [PATCH 2/2] spi: fsl-spi: Allow dynamic allocation of CPM1 parameter RAM Christophe Leroy
2014-10-03 14:44 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2014-10-03 20:15   ` christophe leroy
2014-10-03 20:24     ` Scott Wood
2014-10-04 10:15       ` christophe leroy
2014-10-07  0:19         ` Scott Wood
2014-10-08 16:46           ` leroy christophe
2014-10-08 18:45             ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141003144420.GC24441@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=marcelo@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).