From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/vphn: fix endian issue in NUMA device node code
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 15:36:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141006223639.GC9339@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141003091250.28354.13766.stgit@bahia.local>
On 03.10.2014 [11:13:17 +0200], Greg Kurz wrote:
> The associativity domain numbers are obtained from the hypervisor through
> registers and written into memory by the guest: the packed array passed to
> vphn_unpack_associativity() is then native-endian, unlike what was assumed
> in the following commit:
>
> commit b08a2a12e44eaec5024b2b969f4fcb98169d1ca3
> Author: Alistair Popple <alistair@popple.id.au>
> Date: Wed Aug 7 02:01:44 2013 +1000
>
> powerpc: Make NUMA device node code endian safe
>
> If a CPU home node changes, the topology gets filled with
> bogus values. This leads to severe performance breakdowns.
>
> This patch does two things:
> - extract values from the packed array with shifts, in order to be endian
> neutral
> - convert the resulting values to be32 as expected
>
> Suggested-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - removed the left out __be16 *field declaration
> - removed the left out be16_to_cpup() call
> - updated the comment of the magic formula
>
> Thanks again Nish... the two left outs probably explain why PowerVM wasn't
> happy that patch. :P
Yep, I've tested this v2 patch successfully now!
-Nish
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-06 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-03 9:13 [PATCH v2] powerpc/vphn: fix endian issue in NUMA device node code Greg Kurz
2014-10-06 22:36 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2014-10-07 9:28 ` [v2] " Michael Ellerman
2014-10-10 8:20 ` Greg Kurz
2014-10-15 2:20 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141006223639.GC9339@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).