From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com" <Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"arnab.basu@freescale.com" <arnab.basu@freescale.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu@dudau.co.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
"huxinwei@huawei.com" <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/27] arm/MSI: Save MSI chip in pci_sys_data
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:21:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141020172158.GA8017@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413342435-7876-5-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:06:52AM +0100, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Saving msi chip in pci_sys_data can make pci bus and
> devices don't need to know msi chip detail, it also
> make pci enumeration code be decoupled from msi chip.
> In fact, all pci devices under the same pci hostbridge
> share same msi chip. So msi chip should be seen as one
> of resources or attributes to be initialized in pci host
> bridge driver. Currently, pci hostbridge drivers create
> pci_host_bridge in pci_create_root_bus(), and pass arch
> specific pci sysdata to core pci scan functions. So pci
> arch sysdata is good place to save msi chip.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h | 9 +++++++++
> arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c | 3 +++
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/pci.h | 9 +++++++++
> 5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/=
pci.h
> index 7fc4278..59b0d87 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ struct hw_pci {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
> =09int=09=09domain;
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> +=09struct msi_chip *msi_chip;
> +#endif
> =09struct pci_ops=09*ops;
> =09int=09=09nr_controllers;
> =09void=09=09**private_data;
> @@ -47,6 +50,9 @@ struct pci_sys_data {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
> =09int=09=09domain;
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> +=09struct msi_chip *msi_chip;
> +#endif
This struct is defined for ARM only. We are trying to remove dependency on =
it
so that we can have a single driver for ARM32 and ARM64 systems without
pcibios dependency. Why can't we add this msi chip data to the host
bridge struct instead ? I understand it is all a matter of how to pass
the pointer to pci_scan_root_bus(), where the bridge is created.
We could initialize the msi chip on the bridge through the bus pointer
returned by the pci_scan_root_bus() function.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> =09struct list_head node;
> =09int=09=09busnr;=09=09/* primary bus number=09=09=09*/
> =09u64=09=09mem_offset;=09/* bus->cpu memory mapping offset=09*/
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h
> index 7e95d85..b562c09 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,15 @@ static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */
> =20
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> +static inline struct msi_chip *pci_msi_chip(struct pci_bus *bus)
> +{
> +=09struct pci_sys_data *root =3D bus->sysdata;
> +
> +=09return root->msi_chip;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * The PCI address space does equal the physical memory address space.
> * The networking and block device layers use this boolean for bounce
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> index 17a26c1..a19038d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
> @@ -471,6 +471,9 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, st=
ruct hw_pci *hw,
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS
> =09=09sys->domain =3D hw->domain;
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> +=09=09sys->msi_chip =3D hw->msi_chip;
> +#endif
> =09=09sys->busnr =3D busnr;
> =09=09sys->swizzle =3D hw->swizzle;
> =09=09sys->map_irq =3D hw->map_irq;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index 22e413c..f11108c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, stru=
ct msi_desc *desc)
> =09struct msi_chip *chip =3D dev->bus->msi;
> =09int err;
> =20
> +=09if (!chip)
> +=09=09chip =3D pci_msi_chip(dev->bus);
> +
> =09if (!chip || !chip->setup_irq)
> =09=09return -EINVAL;
> =20
> @@ -50,6 +53,9 @@ void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq)
> =09struct msi_desc *entry =3D irq_get_msi_desc(irq);
> =09struct msi_chip *chip =3D entry->dev->bus->msi;
> =20
> +=09if (!chip)
> +=09=09chip =3D pci_msi_chip(entry->dev->bus);
> +
> =09if (!chip || !chip->teardown_irq)
> =09=09return;
> =20
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 9cd2721..7a48b40 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -1433,6 +1433,15 @@ static inline int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) { re=
turn -ENOSYS; }
> =20
> #include <asm/pci.h>
> =20
> +/* Just avoid compile error, will be clean up later */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> +
> +#ifndef pci_msi_chip
> +#define pci_msi_chip(bus)=09NULL
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif
> +
> /* these helpers provide future and backwards compatibility
> * for accessing popular PCI BAR info */
> #define pci_resource_start(dev, bar)=09((dev)->resource[(bar)].start)
> --=20
> 1.7.1
>=20
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i=
n
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>=20
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-20 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-15 3:06 [PATCH v3 00/27] Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 01/27] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 02/27] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 4:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 4:44 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 03/27] s390/MSI: Use __msi_mask_irq() instead of default_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 04/27] arm/MSI: Save MSI chip in pci_sys_data Yijing Wang
2014-10-20 17:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2014-10-21 1:32 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 5:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 6:32 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 05/27] PCI: tegra: Save msi " Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 5:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 6:23 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 06/27] PCI: designware: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 07/27] PCI: rcar: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 08/27] PCI: mvebu: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 09/27] arm/PCI: Clean unused pcibios_add_bus() and pcibios_remove_bus() Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 5:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 6:39 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 10/27] PCI/MSI: Remove useless bus->msi assignment Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 5:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 6:40 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 11/27] PCI/MSI: Refactor struct msi_chip to make it become more common Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 12/27] x86/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 13/27] x86/xen/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 14/27] Irq_remapping/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 15/27] x86/MSI: Remove unused MSI weak arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 16/27] Mips/MSI: Save msi chip in pci sysdata Yijing Wang
2014-10-25 13:04 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-10-27 1:06 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 17/27] MIPS/Octeon/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 18/27] MIPS/Xlp: Remove the dead function destroy_irq() to fix build error Yijing Wang
2014-10-25 13:11 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 19/27] MIPS/Xlp/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 20/27] MIPS/Xlr/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 21/27] Powerpc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-17 7:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-10-17 7:42 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 22/27] s390/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-16 12:13 ` Sebastian Ott
2014-10-17 1:04 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 23/27] arm/iop13xx/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 24/27] IA64/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-22 23:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 1:17 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 25/27] Sparc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 2:36 ` David Miller
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 26/27] tile/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 27/27] PCI/MSI: Clean up unused MSI arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 5:43 ` [PATCH v3 00/27] Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 7:45 ` Yijing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141020172158.GA8017@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com \
--cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liviu@dudau.co.uk \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).