From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, arnab.basu@freescale.com,
Liviu Dudau <liviu@dudau.co.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Wuyun <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/27] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq()
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:25:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141023042535.GA11770@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413342435-7876-3-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 11:06:50AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Commit 0e4ccb1505a9 ("PCI: Add x86_msi.msi_mask_irq() and msix_mask_irq()")
> introduced two __weak arch functions arch_msix_mask_irq() and
> arch_msi_mask_irq() to work around a bug when running xen in x86.
> These two functions made msi code more complex. This patch reverts
> the commit and introduces a global flag to control msi mask action to
> avoid the bug. The patch is also preparation for using MSI chip framework
> instead of weak arch MSI functions in all platforms. Keep default_msi_mask_irq()
> and default_msix_mask_irq() in linux/msi.h to make s390 MSI code compile
> happy, they will be removed in the later patch.
This patch is basically a revert of 0e4ccb1505a9 intermingled with the
addition of the new pci_msi_ignore_mask technique.
Can you please split this into two patches:
- Add the pci_msi_ignore_mask stuff (alongside the existing way)
- Revert 0e4ccb1505a9
I think that will make it easier to see what's going on.
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
> CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> ---
> Hi David and Konrad,
> I dropped the Acked-by and tested-by, because this version has a
> lot changes compared to last. So, I guess you may want to check it again.
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h | 3 ---
> arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c | 10 ----------
> arch/x86/pci/xen.c | 14 ++------------
> drivers/pci/msi.c | 29 ++++++++++++-----------------
> include/linux/msi.h | 8 ++++++--
> 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> index e45e4da..f58a9c7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
> @@ -172,7 +172,6 @@ struct x86_platform_ops {
>
> struct pci_dev;
> struct msi_msg;
> -struct msi_desc;
>
> struct x86_msi_ops {
> int (*setup_msi_irqs)(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type);
> @@ -183,8 +182,6 @@ struct x86_msi_ops {
> void (*teardown_msi_irqs)(struct pci_dev *dev);
> void (*restore_msi_irqs)(struct pci_dev *dev);
> int (*setup_hpet_msi)(unsigned int irq, unsigned int id);
> - u32 (*msi_mask_irq)(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag);
> - u32 (*msix_mask_irq)(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag);
> };
>
> struct IO_APIC_route_entry;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
> index e48b674..234b072 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
> @@ -116,8 +116,6 @@ struct x86_msi_ops x86_msi = {
> .teardown_msi_irqs = default_teardown_msi_irqs,
> .restore_msi_irqs = default_restore_msi_irqs,
> .setup_hpet_msi = default_setup_hpet_msi,
> - .msi_mask_irq = default_msi_mask_irq,
> - .msix_mask_irq = default_msix_mask_irq,
> };
>
> /* MSI arch specific hooks */
> @@ -140,14 +138,6 @@ void arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> x86_msi.restore_msi_irqs(dev);
> }
> -u32 arch_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> -{
> - return x86_msi.msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
> -}
> -u32 arch_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> -{
> - return x86_msi.msix_mask_irq(desc, flag);
> -}
> #endif
>
> struct x86_io_apic_ops x86_io_apic_ops = {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> index 093f5f4..e5b8b78 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
> @@ -394,14 +394,6 @@ static void xen_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq)
> {
> xen_destroy_irq(irq);
> }
> -static u32 xen_nop_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -static u32 xen_nop_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> #endif
>
> int __init pci_xen_init(void)
> @@ -425,8 +417,7 @@ int __init pci_xen_init(void)
> x86_msi.setup_msi_irqs = xen_setup_msi_irqs;
> x86_msi.teardown_msi_irq = xen_teardown_msi_irq;
> x86_msi.teardown_msi_irqs = xen_teardown_msi_irqs;
> - x86_msi.msi_mask_irq = xen_nop_msi_mask_irq;
> - x86_msi.msix_mask_irq = xen_nop_msix_mask_irq;
> + pci_msi_ignore_mask = 1;
> #endif
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -506,8 +497,7 @@ int __init pci_xen_initial_domain(void)
> x86_msi.setup_msi_irqs = xen_initdom_setup_msi_irqs;
> x86_msi.teardown_msi_irq = xen_teardown_msi_irq;
> x86_msi.restore_msi_irqs = xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs;
> - x86_msi.msi_mask_irq = xen_nop_msi_mask_irq;
> - x86_msi.msix_mask_irq = xen_nop_msix_mask_irq;
> + pci_msi_ignore_mask = 1;
> #endif
> xen_setup_acpi_sci();
> __acpi_register_gsi = acpi_register_gsi_xen;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> index ecb92a5..22e413c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include "pci.h"
>
> static int pci_msi_enable = 1;
> +int pci_msi_ignore_mask;
>
> #define msix_table_size(flags) ((flags & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE) + 1)
>
> @@ -162,11 +163,11 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ u32 msi_mask(unsigned x)
> * reliably as devices without an INTx disable bit will then generate a
> * level IRQ which will never be cleared.
> */
> -u32 default_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> +u32 __msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> {
> u32 mask_bits = desc->masked;
>
> - if (!desc->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> + if (pci_msi_ignore_mask || !desc->msi_attrib.maskbit)
> return 0;
>
> mask_bits &= ~mask;
> @@ -176,14 +177,9 @@ u32 default_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> return mask_bits;
> }
>
> -__weak u32 arch_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> -{
> - return default_msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
> -}
> -
> static void msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> {
> - desc->masked = arch_msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
> + desc->masked = __msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, flag);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -193,11 +189,15 @@ static void msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag)
> * file. This saves a few milliseconds when initialising devices with lots
> * of MSI-X interrupts.
> */
> -u32 default_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> +u32 __msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> {
> u32 mask_bits = desc->masked;
> unsigned offset = desc->msi_attrib.entry_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE +
> PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_VECTOR_CTRL;
> +
> + if (pci_msi_ignore_mask)
> + return 0;
> +
> mask_bits &= ~PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT;
> if (flag)
> mask_bits |= PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT;
> @@ -206,14 +206,9 @@ u32 default_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> return mask_bits;
> }
>
> -__weak u32 arch_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> -{
> - return default_msix_mask_irq(desc, flag);
> -}
> -
> static void msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag)
> {
> - desc->masked = arch_msix_mask_irq(desc, flag);
> + desc->masked = __msix_mask_irq(desc, flag);
> }
>
> static void msi_set_mask_bit(struct irq_data *data, u32 flag)
> @@ -866,7 +861,7 @@ void pci_msi_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev)
> /* Return the device with MSI unmasked as initial states */
> mask = msi_mask(desc->msi_attrib.multi_cap);
> /* Keep cached state to be restored */
> - arch_msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, ~mask);
> + __msi_mask_irq(desc, mask, ~mask);
>
> /* Restore dev->irq to its default pin-assertion irq */
> dev->irq = desc->msi_attrib.default_irq;
> @@ -964,7 +959,7 @@ void pci_msix_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev)
> /* Return the device with MSI-X masked as initial states */
> list_for_each_entry(entry, &dev->msi_list, list) {
> /* Keep cached states to be restored */
> - arch_msix_mask_irq(entry, 1);
> + __msix_mask_irq(entry, 1);
> }
>
> msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE, 0);
> diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
> index 44f4746..9ac1e3b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/msi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/msi.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ struct msi_msg {
> u32 data; /* 16 bits of msi message data */
> };
>
> +extern int pci_msi_ignore_mask;
> +
> /* Helper functions */
> struct irq_data;
> struct msi_desc;
> @@ -21,6 +23,8 @@ void __write_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *entry, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void read_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void get_cached_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg);
> void write_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg);
> +u32 __msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag);
> +u32 __msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag);
>
> struct msi_desc {
> struct {
> @@ -61,8 +65,8 @@ void arch_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
>
> void default_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> void default_restore_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev);
> -u32 default_msi_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 mask, u32 flag);
> -u32 default_msix_mask_irq(struct msi_desc *desc, u32 flag);
> +#define default_msi_mask_irq __msi_mask_irq
> +#define default_msix_mask_irq __msix_mask_irq
>
> struct msi_chip {
> struct module *owner;
> --
> 1.7.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-23 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-15 3:06 [PATCH v3 00/27] Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 01/27] MSI: Remove the redundant irq_set_chip_data() Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 02/27] x86/xen/MSI: Eliminate arch_msix_mask_irq() and arch_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 4:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2014-10-23 4:44 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 03/27] s390/MSI: Use __msi_mask_irq() instead of default_msi_mask_irq() Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 04/27] arm/MSI: Save MSI chip in pci_sys_data Yijing Wang
2014-10-20 17:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-21 1:32 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 5:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 6:32 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 05/27] PCI: tegra: Save msi " Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 5:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 6:23 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 06/27] PCI: designware: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 07/27] PCI: rcar: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 08/27] PCI: mvebu: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 09/27] arm/PCI: Clean unused pcibios_add_bus() and pcibios_remove_bus() Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 5:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 6:39 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 10/27] PCI/MSI: Remove useless bus->msi assignment Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 5:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 6:40 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:06 ` [PATCH v3 11/27] PCI/MSI: Refactor struct msi_chip to make it become more common Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 12/27] x86/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 13/27] x86/xen/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 14/27] Irq_remapping/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 15/27] x86/MSI: Remove unused MSI weak arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 16/27] Mips/MSI: Save msi chip in pci sysdata Yijing Wang
2014-10-25 13:04 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-10-27 1:06 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 17/27] MIPS/Octeon/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 18/27] MIPS/Xlp: Remove the dead function destroy_irq() to fix build error Yijing Wang
2014-10-25 13:11 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 19/27] MIPS/Xlp/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 20/27] MIPS/Xlr/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 21/27] Powerpc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-17 7:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-10-17 7:42 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 22/27] s390/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-16 12:13 ` Sebastian Ott
2014-10-17 1:04 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 23/27] arm/iop13xx/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 24/27] IA64/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-22 23:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 1:17 ` Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 25/27] Sparc/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 2:36 ` David Miller
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 26/27] tile/MSI: " Yijing Wang
2014-10-15 3:07 ` [PATCH v3 27/27] PCI/MSI: Clean up unused MSI arch functions Yijing Wang
2014-10-23 5:43 ` [PATCH v3 00/27] Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X in all platforms Bjorn Helgaas
2014-10-23 7:45 ` Yijing Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141023042535.GA11770@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com \
--cc=arnab.basu@freescale.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=liviu@dudau.co.uk \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).