linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	jstancek@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [2/2] powerpc/numa: ensure per-cpu NUMA mappings are correct on topology update
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:33:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141028173318.GA4211@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141021043627.99A4F14008C@ozlabs.org>

Hi Michael,

On 21.10.2014 [15:36:27 +1100], Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-18-10 at 00:50:40 UTC, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > We received a report of warning in kernel/sched/core.c where the sched
> > group was NULL on an LPAR after a topology update. This seems to occur
> > because after the topology update has moved the CPUs, cpu_to_node is
> > returning the old value still, which ends up breaking the consistency of
> > the NUMA topology in the per-cpu maps. Ensure that we update the per-cpu
> > fields when we re-map CPUs.
> 
> This looks like a bug fix, I assume you want it to go in for 3.18 ?

Yes, please!

Thanks,
Nish

      reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-18  0:49 [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/numa: use cached value of update->cpu in update_cpu_topology Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-10-18  0:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/numa: ensure per-cpu NUMA mappings are correct on topology update Nishanth Aravamudan
2014-10-21  4:36   ` [2/2] " Michael Ellerman
2014-10-28 17:33     ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141028173318.GA4211@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).