LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	paulus@samba.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	dave.long@linaro.org, eiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	cmetcalf@tilera.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	linux390@de.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] make CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM a core non-debug feature
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 19:59:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141104195914.GY22224@bivouac.eciton.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jL1BBAvoxVqFa1YHJSMCbGdLiPey-dyC15YKVPB2xGfig@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:43:00AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/Kconfig b/drivers/char/Kconfig
> > index efefd12..39f7817 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/char/Kconfig
> > @@ -6,6 +6,22 @@ menu "Character devices"
> >
> >  source "drivers/tty/Kconfig"
> >
> > +config STRICT_DEVMEM
> > +       bool "Reduced access to /dev/mem"
> > +       depends on HAVE_ARCH_RESTRICTED_DEVMEM
> > +       default y
> > +       help
> > +         If this option is disabled, you allow userspace (root) access to all
> > +         of memory, including kernel and userspace memory. Accidental
> > +         access to this is obviously disastrous, but specific access can
> > +         be used by people debugging the kernel.
> > +
> > +         If this option is switched on, the /dev/mem file restricts userspace
> > +         access to an architecture-specific subset of the physical address
> > +         space.
> 
> Great consolidation, thanks! I would probably expand this help text a
> bit to include some of details mentioned in the x86 portion of the
> option. For example:
> 
> 
> If this option is switched on, the /dev/mem file restricts userspace
> access to an architecture-specific subset of the physical address
> space. For example on x86, PCI space and BIOS code and data
> regions. This is sufficient for things like dosemu and non-KMS
> Xorg and all common users of /dev/mem.

I considered doing that, but didn't want to risk listing too many
details of one architecture, and too few of others.

One alternative would be to add a devmem.txt somewhere in
Documentation, listing the behaviours on different architectures (this
would also be a good place to describe restrictions on types of
mappings and suchlike). The help message could then contain a mention
of that file. Would that work for you?

I really don't have a strong opinion however, and would be happy to go
along with whatever the most people would like to see.

/
	Leif

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-04 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-04 17:23 [RFC PATCH] make CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM a core non-debug feature Leif Lindholm
2014-11-04 18:43 ` Kees Cook
2014-11-04 19:59   ` Leif Lindholm [this message]
2014-11-04 20:02     ` Kees Cook
2014-11-04 20:18       ` Leif Lindholm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141104195914.GY22224@bivouac.eciton.net \
    --to=leif.lindholm@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=eiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox