From: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/vphn: move endianness fixing to vphn_unpack_associativity()
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:38:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112083853.6896.45789.stgit@bahia.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141112083123.6492.22889.stgit@bahia.local>
The first argument to vphn_unpack_associativity() is a const long *, but the
parsing code expects __be64 values actually. This is inconsistent. We should
either pass a const __be64 * or change vphn_unpack_associativity() so that
it fixes endianness by itself.
This patch does the latter, since the caller doesn't need to know about
endianness and this allows to fix significant 64-bit values only. Please
note that the previous code was able to cope with 32-bit fields being split
accross two consecutives 64-bit values. Since PAPR+ doesn't say this cannot
happen, the behaviour was kept. It requires extra checking to know when fixing
is needed though.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
index e30c469..903ef27 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -1417,30 +1417,49 @@ static int update_cpu_associativity_changes_mask(void)
*/
static int vphn_unpack_associativity(const long *packed, __be32 *unpacked)
{
- int i;
- const __be16 *field = (const __be16 *) packed;
+ int i, j, k;
+ union {
+ __be64 packed[VPHN_REGISTER_COUNT];
+ __be16 field[VPHN_REGISTER_COUNT * 4];
+ } fixed;
#define VPHN_FIELD_UNUSED (0xffff)
#define VPHN_FIELD_MSB (0x8000)
#define VPHN_FIELD_MASK (~VPHN_FIELD_MSB)
- for (i = 1; i < VPHN_ASSOC_BUFSIZE; i++) {
- if (be16_to_cpup(field) == VPHN_FIELD_UNUSED)
+ for (i = 1, j = 0, k = 0; i < VPHN_ASSOC_BUFSIZE;) {
+ u16 field;
+
+ if (j % 4 == 0) {
+ fixed.packed[k] = cpu_to_be64(packed[k]);
+ k++;
+ }
+
+ field = be16_to_cpu(fixed.field[j]);
+
+ if (field == VPHN_FIELD_UNUSED)
/* All significant fields processed.
*/
break;
- if (be16_to_cpup(field) & VPHN_FIELD_MSB) {
+ if (field & VPHN_FIELD_MSB) {
/* Data is in the lower 15 bits of this field */
- unpacked[i] = cpu_to_be32(
- be16_to_cpup(field) & VPHN_FIELD_MASK);
- field++;
+ unpacked[i++] = cpu_to_be32(field & VPHN_FIELD_MASK);
+ j++;
} else {
/* Data is in the lower 15 bits of this field
* concatenated with the next 16 bit field
*/
- unpacked[i] = *((__be32 *)field);
- field += 2;
+ if (unlikely(j % 4 == 3)) {
+ /* The next field is to be copied from the next
+ * 64-bit input value. We must fix it now.
+ */
+ fixed.packed[k] = cpu_to_be64(packed[k]);
+ k++;
+ }
+
+ unpacked[i++] = *((__be32 *)&fixed.field[j]);
+ j += 2;
}
}
@@ -1460,11 +1479,8 @@ static long hcall_vphn(unsigned long cpu, __be32 *associativity)
long retbuf[PLPAR_HCALL9_BUFSIZE] = {0};
u64 flags = 1;
int hwcpu = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
- int i;
rc = plpar_hcall9(H_HOME_NODE_ASSOCIATIVITY, retbuf, flags, hwcpu);
- for (i = 0; i < VPHN_REGISTER_COUNT; i++)
- retbuf[i] = cpu_to_be64(retbuf[i]);
vphn_unpack_associativity(retbuf, associativity);
return rc;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-12 8:31 [PATCH 0/3] VPHN parsing fixes Greg Kurz
2014-11-12 8:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/vphn: clarify the H_HOME_NODE_ASSOCIATIVITY API Greg Kurz
2014-11-12 8:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/vphn: simplify the parsing code Greg Kurz
2014-11-12 8:38 ` Greg Kurz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141112083853.6896.45789.stgit@bahia.local \
--to=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).