From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EA4E1A09C0 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:20:51 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net (shards.monkeyblade.net [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:36:211:85ff:fe63:a549]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B1B1400DE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:20:50 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:20:42 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20141118.132042.1805477418902433426.davem@davemloft.net> To: alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] PPC: bpf_jit_comp: Unify BPF_MOD | BPF_X and BPF_DIV | BPF_X From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <1416275444.1107.4.camel@concordia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kda@linux-powerpc.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, dborkman@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, felix@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 07:37:21 -0800 > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Denis Kirjanov wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> This patch added no new functionality so I haven't put the test >> results (of course I ran the test suite to check the patch). >> >> The output : >> [ 650.198958] test_bpf: Summary: 60 PASSED, 0 FAILED > > Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Applied, thanks everyone. > btw, please don't top post. Seriously, it's my biggest pet peeve. It's like going to a dinner party and eating with your feet.