From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BC441A01FC for ; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 03:00:24 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:00:11 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Madhavan Srinivasan Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2]powerpc: foundation code to handle CR5 for local_t Message-ID: <20141128160011.GB28943@gate.crashing.org> References: <1417090721-25298-1-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1417090721-25298-2-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141127165650.GA28278@gate.crashing.org> <5477E492.4000009@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <5477E492.4000009@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 08:27:22AM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > > Have you tested this with (upcoming) GCC 5.0? GCC now uses CR5, > > and it likes to use it very much, it might be more convenient to > > use e.g. CR1 (which is allocated almost last, only before CR0). > > > No. I did not try it with GCC5.0 But I did force kernel compilation with > fixed-cr5 which should make GCC avoid using CR5. But i will try that today. It should work just fine, but testing is always useful, because, you know, "should". Thanks. Segher