From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 316A11A00BC for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:24:53 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from e23smtp08.au.ibm.com (e23smtp08.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 011981400B7 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:24:52 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp08.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 08:24:50 +1000 Received: from d23relay09.au.ibm.com (d23relay09.au.ibm.com [9.185.63.181]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE013578067 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:24:48 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.97]) by d23relay09.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id sAUMOd9x37552182 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:24:47 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id sAUMOFP0016330 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:24:15 +1100 Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:23:50 +1100 From: Gavin Shan To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [2/3] powerpc/powernv: Replace OPAL_DEASSERT_RESET with EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE Message-ID: <20141130222350.GA5371@shangw> Reply-To: Gavin Shan References: <1416868020-4129-2-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20141126040751.3649B14017B@ozlabs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20141126040751.3649B14017B@ozlabs.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Gavin Shan List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:07:51PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: >On Mon, 2014-24-11 at 22:26:59 UTC, Gavin Shan wrote: >> The flag passed to ioda_eeh_phb_reset() should be EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE, >> which is translated to OPAL_DEASSERT_RESET or something else by the >> EEH backend accordingly. >> >> The patch replaces OPAL_DEASSERT_RESET with EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE for >> ioda_eeh_phb_reset(). > >What is the symptom? Does it not work at all or is it just a cosmetic issue? >ie. should I send this to Linus ASAP or can it wait for the next release. > >Looks like this went in as 361f2a2a1536 ("powrpc/powernv: Reset PHB in kdump >kernel") in 3.16. Should it go to stable? > It's just a cosmetic issue and please pick it up for next release. Thanks, Gavin >cheers >