From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab: Fix nodeid bounds check for non-contiguous node IDs
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 16:24:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141201052448.GC11234@drongo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417410134.16178.2.camel@concordia>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 04:02:14PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 15:28 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > The bounds check for nodeid in ____cache_alloc_node gives false
> > positives on machines where the node IDs are not contiguous, leading
> > to a panic at boot time. For example, on a POWER8 machine the node
> > IDs are typically 0, 1, 16 and 17. This means that num_online_nodes()
> > returns 4, so when ____cache_alloc_node is called with nodeid = 16 the
> > VM_BUG_ON triggers, like this:
> ...
> >
> > To fix this, we instead compare the nodeid with MAX_NUMNODES, and
> > additionally make sure it isn't negative (since nodeid is an int).
> > The check is there mainly to protect the array dereference in the
> > get_node() call in the next line, and the array being dereferenced is
> > of size MAX_NUMNODES. If the nodeid is in range but invalid (for
> > example if the node is off-line), the BUG_ON in the next line will
> > catch that.
>
> When did this break? How come we only just noticed?
Commit 14e50c6a9bc2, which went into 3.10-rc1.
You'll only notice if you have CONFIG_SLAB=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_VM=y
and you're running on a machine with discontiguous node IDs.
> Also needs:
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
It does. I remembered that a minute after I sent the patch.
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-01 5:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-01 4:28 [PATCH v2] slab: Fix nodeid bounds check for non-contiguous node IDs Paul Mackerras
2014-12-01 4:58 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-12-01 5:02 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-12-01 5:24 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2014-12-01 8:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-12-01 9:22 ` Pekka Enberg
2014-12-01 21:06 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141201052448.GC11234@drongo \
--to=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).