linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, lkp@01.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
	yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bsegall@google.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mingo@redhat.com, sp@datera.io,
	daniel@numascale.com, tj@kernel.org, subbaram@codeaurora.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	pjt@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: kthread_bind fails to enforce CPU affinity (fixes kernel BUG at kernel/smpboot.c:134!)
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:18:59 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141208211859.6e81ec81@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141208083408.GA8023@gmail.com>


Hi Ingo,

> So we cannot call set_task_cpu() because in the normal life time 
> of a task the ->cpu value gets set on wakeup. So if a task is 
> blocked right now, and its affinity changes, it ought to get a 
> correct ->cpu selected on wakeup. The affinity mask and the 
> current value of ->cpu getting out of sync is thus 'normal'.
> 
> (Check for example how set_cpus_allowed_ptr() works: we first set 
> the new allowed mask, then do we migrate the task away if 
> necessary.)
> 
> In the kthread_bind() case this is explicitly assumed: it only 
> calls do_set_cpus_allowed().
> 
> But obviously the bug triggers in kernel/smpboot.c, and that 
> assert shows a real bug - and your patch makes the assert go 
> away, so the question is, how did the kthread get woken up and 
> put on a runqueue without its ->cpu getting set?

I started going down this line earlier today, and found things like:

select_task_rq_fair:

        if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
                return prev_cpu;

I tried returning cpumask_first(tsk_cpus_allowed()) instead, and while
I couldn't hit the BUG I did manage to get a scheduler lockup during
testing.

At that point I thought the previous task_cpu() was somewhat ingrained
in the scheduler and came up with the patch. If not, we could go on a
hunt to see what else needs fixing.

Anton

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-08 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-08  3:27 [PATCH] kthread: kthread_bind fails to enforce CPU affinity (fixes kernel BUG at kernel/smpboot.c:134!) Anton Blanchard
2014-12-08  4:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-12-08  4:46   ` Anton Blanchard
2014-12-08  8:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-12-08 10:18   ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2014-12-08 23:58     ` [PATCH] powerpc: secondary CPUs signal to master before setting active and online " Anton Blanchard
2014-12-09 20:54       ` Linus Torvalds
2014-12-10 14:08         ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-12-10 23:06         ` Michael Ellerman
2014-12-08 13:54 ` [PATCH] kthread: kthread_bind fails to enforce CPU affinity " Steven Rostedt
2014-12-09  2:24   ` Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141208211859.6e81ec81@kryten \
    --to=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@numascale.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sp@datera.io \
    --cc=subbaram@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).