From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771CA1A04CD for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 03:22:04 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pokefinder.org (sauhun.de [89.238.76.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D31A51400A0 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 03:22:02 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:21:46 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] macintosh: therm_pm72: delete deprecated driver Message-ID: <20141219162146.GA3632@katana> References: <1415238358-2453-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <1415240376.4925.2.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <20141106092551.GA1333@katana> <1415267404.4925.15.camel@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn" In-Reply-To: <1415267404.4925.15.camel@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Michael Ellerman List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 08:50:04PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 10:25 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:19:36PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 02:45 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > The new driver is around for more than 2 years now, so the old one = can > > > > go. Getting rid of it helps the removal of the legacy .attach_adapt= er > > > > callback of the I2C subsystem. > > > >=20 > > > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > > >=20 > > > Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > >=20 > > Thanks! I can take it via my I2C tree, but I'd think it makes more sense > > if you take it via ppc? What do you prefer? >=20 > Either works. These days Michael Ellerman handles the day to day > maintainance of the powerpc tree so it's his choice but if you need this > as a dependency on your subsequent API removal it's probably better that > you take it. So, I haven't seen this coming in via ppc. I am going to send another pull request to Linus tomorrow and will include it unless somebody objects soon. --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUlFCaAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2cxwP/0hreVNbRZVYWTeEwXRl6PMe mTVz5+uiVZgH4hk1iqlTTMMkf5o4rvG4M2Bk5o1a8nOKl1DeURiif+PFO4QffjEd HmDQJb81+AV0eDuh056RlWGvJrzCNPjaayH/TdPKkGBGMn2qfF1i/DUJXv733oTk ncc36SNXH8GGHoPfPUj7AfCK7j7Z1/F2OJA5WMScirG4dsl3pY+7qduBuvwVvmS5 /F1hXnHsautcKaoob5GfYVArns9v3x9sRLHS5qdRopnJzWqeAVExBwQGDOuJJEw/ hHJ6lH6REn1FUjQ2bUX1BBREFDFUnQsYfgPn6iH6JyfdFsTPDba/uRy1UPePZyd5 rHkHAcsqKBc2sZpu9gEuzB4XsiUJUZOoyZAf77fZ4/XMwTEtFhxC04b9z4lD/ou2 5bU25iBGwYDPvwl/7aB+y9Vi34ytHe2qOndOEvEipdZD2MGEln47avz06+L/Qizi 6MPqTbAfyIUhP32kJYI87N+6S2z47EaOgjdUQd6RnTt0pu8vBVJuzNxbo1awBXWg gTEre7AwXP4wTRz5RgvgjMz0hSCyr9VG9EEhBkBVKdtnOr/i2v5GYJS2GDNAZXzR 1NRsw5h2IC0sHjFj99RLFxq8PgJmta9Pmg3wDZTqHEdmXKdficdS4ZRWi5fpyrsB I8ZeXmLx6gcJLR8v+6KM =wMth -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn--