From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk (pandora.arm.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:3201:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1BC1A0651 for ; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:12:33 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 19:12:10 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: drop ancient protection against sysfs refcounting issues Message-ID: <20150119191210.GE26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1421693756-12917-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1421693756-12917-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> Sender: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Pantelis Antoniou , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Jean Delvare , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 07:55:56PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Back in the days, sysfs seemed to have refcounting issues and subsystems > needed a completion to be safe. This is not the case anymore, so I2C can > get rid of this code. There is noone else besides I2C doing something > like this currently (checked with the attached coccinelle script which > checks if a release function exists and if it contains a completion). Have you validated this with DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE enabled? -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.