From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp05.in.ibm.com (e28smtp05.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C071A09EB for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:43:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp05.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:13:12 +0530 Received: from d28relay01.in.ibm.com (d28relay01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.58]) by d28dlp01.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87B1E0054 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:14:27 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (d28av02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.64]) by d28relay01.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t0S5h5hX33423518 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:13:06 +0530 Received: from d28av02.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av02.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t0S5h5xR030937 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:13:05 +0530 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:12:45 +0530 From: "Naveen N. Rao" To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/8] Fix perf probe issues on powerpc Message-ID: <20150128054245.GA2078@naverao1-tp.in.ibm.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 2014/12/15 08:20PM, Naveen N Rao wrote: > This patchset fixes various issues with perf probe on powerpc across ABIv1 and > ABIv2: > - in the presence of DWARF debug-info, > - in the absence of DWARF, but with the symbol table, and > - in the absence of debug-info, but with kallsyms. > > Applies cleanly on -tip. Tested on ppc64 BE and LE. > > Changes from previous version: > Addressed various review comments from Mike Ellerman largely to generalize > changes. Some of the simpler patches have been retained in their previous form > to limit code churn, while others have been generalized by introducing arch > helpers. Individual patches have more details. Michael, Can you please take a quick look at this? - Naveen