From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp04.au.ibm.com (e23smtp04.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63DA41A0073 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:52:17 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp04.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:52:16 +1000 Received: from d23relay10.au.ibm.com (d23relay10.au.ibm.com [9.190.26.77]) by d23dlp01.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF532CE804E for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:52:13 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay10.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t1A1q5NN50397378 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:52:13 +1100 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t1A1pd1W008158 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:51:39 +1100 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:51:23 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 07/17] powerpc/pci: Don't unset pci resources for VFs Message-ID: <20150210015123.GC6326@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20150113180502.GC2776@google.com> <1421288887-7765-1-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1421288887-7765-8-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1423528584.4924.70.camel@au1.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1423528584.4924.70.camel@au1.ibm.com> Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Wei Yang , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:36:24AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 10:27 +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >> If we're going to reassign resources with flag PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_RSRC, all >> resources will be cleaned out during device header fixup time and then get >> reassigned by PCI core. However, the VF resources won't be reassigned and >> thus, we shouldn't clean them out. >> >> This patch adds a condition. If the pci_dev is a VF, skip the resource >> unset process. > >I don't understand this, can you elaborate ? Why wouldn't we reassign >the IOV resource just like everything else ? Sure. VFs work a little bit different from normal devices. On powernv platform, we have PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_RSRC set, which means all resource retrieved from hardware will be cleaned and re-assigned by kernel. While VF's resources are calculated from PF's IOV BAR, in virtfn_add(). And after this, there is not re-assign process for VFs. > >Ben. > >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang >> --- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c >> index 37d512d..889f743 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c >> @@ -788,6 +788,10 @@ static void pcibios_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev) >> pci_name(dev)); >> return; >> } >> + >> + if (dev->is_virtfn) >> + return; >> + >> for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) { >> struct resource *res = dev->resource + i; >> struct pci_bus_region reg; > -- Richard Yang Help you, Help me