From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux PPC dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Sam Bobroff <sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: suspicious RCU usage clockevents_lock, tick_broadcast_lock, hrtimer_bases.lock
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 06:26:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150213142603.GV4166@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54DDA645.6080600@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:52:45PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> On 02/13/2015 10:57 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> > On 02/13/2015 06:27 AM, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm receiving this while booting a vanilla 3.19 kernel on a Power 8 machine:
> >
> > Does the below patch fix the issue ?
> >
> > From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > [PATCH] tick/hrtimer-broadcast: Fix a suspicious RCU usage in the tick broadcast path
> >
> > ---
> > kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> > index eb682d5..57b8e32 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int bc_set_next(ktime_t expires, struct clock_event_device *bc)
> > * HRTIMER_RESTART.
> > */
> > if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&bctimer) >= 0) {
> > - hrtimer_start(&bctimer, expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
> > + RCU_NONIDLE(hrtimer_start(&bctimer, expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED));
> > /* Bind the "device" to the cpu */
> > bc->bound_on = smp_processor_id();
> > } else if (bc->bound_on == smp_processor_id()) {
> >
> Actually the below patch is the complete fix. Paul can you please
> review this ? As an alternate solution I checked to see if its
> possible to move rcu_idle_enter()/exit() closer to the
> cpuidle_enter() call, but that won't work as you may have already
> tried earlier.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> tick/broadcast-hrtimer : Fix suspicious RCU usage in idle loop
>
> From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> The hrtimer mode of broadcast queues hrtimers in the idle entry
> path so as to wakeup cpus in deep idle states. hrtimer_{start/cancel}
> functions call into tracing which uses RCU. But it is not legal to call
> into RCU in cpuidle because it is one of the quiescent states. Hence
> protect this region with RCU_NONIDLE which informs RCU that the cpu
> is momentarily non-idle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Another alternative would be to change the hrtimer_{start/cancel}()
functions' tracepoints to the _rcuidle form. The advantage of this
approach is less RCU-notification overhead when tracing is enabled.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> index eb682d5..d3dd564 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static void bc_set_mode(enum clock_event_mode mode,
> */
> static int bc_set_next(ktime_t expires, struct clock_event_device *bc)
> {
> + int bc_moved;
> /*
> * We try to cancel the timer first. If the callback is on
> * flight on some other cpu then we let it handle it. If we
> @@ -60,9 +61,15 @@ static int bc_set_next(ktime_t expires, struct clock_event_device *bc)
> * restart the timer because we are in the callback, but we
> * can set the expiry time and let the callback return
> * HRTIMER_RESTART.
> + *
> + * Since we are in the idle loop at this point and because
> + * hrtimer_{start/cancel} functions call into tracing,
> + * calls to these functions must be bound within RCU_NONIDLE.
> */
> - if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&bctimer) >= 0) {
> - hrtimer_start(&bctimer, expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
> + RCU_NONIDLE(bc_moved = (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&bctimer) >= 0) ?
> + !hrtimer_start(&bctimer, expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED) :
> + 0);
> + if (bc_moved) {
> /* Bind the "device" to the cpu */
> bc->bound_on = smp_processor_id();
> } else if (bc->bound_on == smp_processor_id()) {
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
> Preeti U Murthy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-13 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-13 0:57 suspicious RCU usage clockevents_lock, tick_broadcast_lock, hrtimer_bases.lock Sam Bobroff
2015-02-13 5:27 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-02-13 7:22 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-02-13 14:26 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-02-16 3:19 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-02-16 5:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-16 6:06 ` Preeti U Murthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150213142603.GV4166@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).