From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux PPC dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Sam Bobroff <sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: suspicious RCU usage clockevents_lock, tick_broadcast_lock, hrtimer_bases.lock
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 21:50:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150216055017.GE4166@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54E161B0.5020105@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 08:49:12AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> On 02/13/2015 07:56 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:52:45PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> >> On 02/13/2015 10:57 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> >>> On 02/13/2015 06:27 AM, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm receiving this while booting a vanilla 3.19 kernel on a Power 8 machine:
> >>>
> >>> Does the below patch fix the issue ?
> >>>
> >>> From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>>
> >>> [PATCH] tick/hrtimer-broadcast: Fix a suspicious RCU usage in the tick broadcast path
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> >>> index eb682d5..57b8e32 100644
> >>> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> >>> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast-hrtimer.c
> >>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int bc_set_next(ktime_t expires, struct clock_event_device *bc)
> >>> * HRTIMER_RESTART.
> >>> */
> >>> if (hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&bctimer) >= 0) {
> >>> - hrtimer_start(&bctimer, expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED);
> >>> + RCU_NONIDLE(hrtimer_start(&bctimer, expires, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED));
> >>> /* Bind the "device" to the cpu */
> >>> bc->bound_on = smp_processor_id();
> >>> } else if (bc->bound_on == smp_processor_id()) {
> >>>
> >> Actually the below patch is the complete fix. Paul can you please
> >> review this ? As an alternate solution I checked to see if its
> >> possible to move rcu_idle_enter()/exit() closer to the
> >> cpuidle_enter() call, but that won't work as you may have already
> >> tried earlier.
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> tick/broadcast-hrtimer : Fix suspicious RCU usage in idle loop
> >>
> >> From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> The hrtimer mode of broadcast queues hrtimers in the idle entry
> >> path so as to wakeup cpus in deep idle states. hrtimer_{start/cancel}
> >> functions call into tracing which uses RCU. But it is not legal to call
> >> into RCU in cpuidle because it is one of the quiescent states. Hence
> >> protect this region with RCU_NONIDLE which informs RCU that the cpu
> >> is momentarily non-idle.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Another alternative would be to change the hrtimer_{start/cancel}()
> > functions' tracepoints to the _rcuidle form. The advantage of this
> > approach is less RCU-notification overhead when tracing is enabled.
>
> But since the hrtimer_{start/cancel} functions' tracepoints are more
> often called from paths which are in the non-quiescent states, wouldn't
> we be doing an rcu_irq_enter/exit() redundantly far too often in that case ?
And the other advantage of doing it the way you did (and I -did- give
you a Reviewed-by!) is that you are incurring the extra overhead from
the idle loop, where that extra overhead is less likely to be holding
something else up. So, yes, I do agree with your patch.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-16 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-13 0:57 suspicious RCU usage clockevents_lock, tick_broadcast_lock, hrtimer_bases.lock Sam Bobroff
2015-02-13 5:27 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-02-13 7:22 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-02-13 14:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-16 3:19 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-02-16 5:50 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-02-16 6:06 ` Preeti U Murthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150216055017.GE4166@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).