* [PATCH v3] Fix missing L2 cache size in /sys/devices/system/cpu
@ 2015-02-26 0:04 olson
2015-03-26 4:49 ` [v3] " Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: olson @ 2015-02-26 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Dave Olson
From: Dave Olson <olson@cumulusnetworks.com>
This problem appears to have been introduced in 2.6.29 by
93197a36a9c16a85fb24cf5a8639f7bf9af838a3.
This caused lscpu to error out on e500v2 devices, and probably others
error: cannot open /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index2/size: No such file or directory
Some embedded powerpc systems use cache-size in DTS for the unified L2 cache
size, not d-cache-size, so we need to allow for both DTS names. Added a
new CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D cache_type_info structure to handle this.
This patch is against git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git
next branch. It is the same as the v2 patch, but against next, rather than master.
I can rebase, if desired.
Signed-off-by: Dave Olson <olson@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
index ae77b7e..860ed54 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
@@ -61,12 +61,22 @@ struct cache_type_info {
};
/* These are used to index the cache_type_info array. */
-#define CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED 0
-#define CACHE_TYPE_INSTRUCTION 1
-#define CACHE_TYPE_DATA 2
+#define CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED 0 /* cache-size, cache-block-size, etc. */
+#define CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D 1 /* d-cache-size, d-cache-block-size, etc */
+#define CACHE_TYPE_INSTRUCTION 2
+#define CACHE_TYPE_DATA 3
static const struct cache_type_info cache_type_info[] = {
{
+ /* Embedded systems that use cache-size, cache-block-size,
+ * etc. for the Unified (typically L2) cache. */
+ .name = "Unified",
+ .size_prop = "cache-size",
+ .line_size_props = { "cache-line-size",
+ "cache-block-size", },
+ .nr_sets_prop = "cache-sets",
+ },
+ {
/* PowerPC Processor binding says the [di]-cache-*
* must be equal on unified caches, so just use
* d-cache properties. */
@@ -293,7 +303,8 @@ static struct cache *cache_find_first_sibling(struct cache *cache)
{
struct cache *iter;
- if (cache->type == CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED)
+ if (cache->type == CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED ||
+ cache->type == CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D)
return cache;
list_for_each_entry(iter, &cache_list, list)
@@ -324,14 +335,33 @@ static bool cache_node_is_unified(const struct device_node *np)
return of_get_property(np, "cache-unified", NULL);
}
+/*
+ * Handle unified caches that have two different types of tags. Most embedded
+ * use cache-size, etc. for the unified cache size, but open firmware systems
+ * use d-cache-size, etc. Since they all appear to be consistent, check on
+ * initialization for which type we are, and use the appropriate structure.
+ */
static struct cache *cache_do_one_devnode_unified(struct device_node *node,
int level)
{
struct cache *cache;
+ int ucache;
pr_debug("creating L%d ucache for %s\n", level, node->full_name);
cache = new_cache(CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level, node);
+ if (of_get_property(node,
+ cache_type_info[CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D].size_prop, NULL)) {
+ ucache = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D;
+ } else {
+ ucache = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED; /* assume embedded */
+ if (of_get_property(node,
+ cache_type_info[CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED].size_prop, NULL) ==
+ NULL)
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "Unified cache property missing\n");
+ }
+
+ cache = new_cache(ucache, level, node);
return cache;
}
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3] Fix missing L2 cache size in /sys/devices/system/cpu
2015-02-26 0:04 [PATCH v3] Fix missing L2 cache size in /sys/devices/system/cpu olson
@ 2015-03-26 4:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-03-26 19:49 ` Dave Olson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2015-03-26 4:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Olson, linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Dave Olson
On Thu, 2015-26-02 at 00:04:47 UTC, Dave Olson wrote:
> @@ -324,14 +335,33 @@ static bool cache_node_is_unified(const struct device_node *np)
> return of_get_property(np, "cache-unified", NULL);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Handle unified caches that have two different types of tags. Most embedded
> + * use cache-size, etc. for the unified cache size, but open firmware systems
> + * use d-cache-size, etc. Since they all appear to be consistent, check on
> + * initialization for which type we are, and use the appropriate structure.
> + */
> static struct cache *cache_do_one_devnode_unified(struct device_node *node,
> int level)
> {
> struct cache *cache;
> + int ucache;
>
> pr_debug("creating L%d ucache for %s\n", level, node->full_name);
>
> cache = new_cache(CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level, node);
^^
> + if (of_get_property(node,
> + cache_type_info[CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D].size_prop, NULL)) {
> + ucache = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D;
> + } else {
> + ucache = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED; /* assume embedded */
> + if (of_get_property(node,
> + cache_type_info[CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED].size_prop, NULL) ==
> + NULL)
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Unified cache property missing\n");
> + }
> +
> + cache = new_cache(ucache, level, node);
^^
>
> return cache;
> }
That looks fishy. You create a cache, and then throw it away and create another
one and return that. I don't think that's what you intended, is it?
It would also be cleaner I think if you created another helper, eg.
cache_is_unified_d() to do the property lookup.
And also I don't think you need to do the second property lookup, especially if
all you're going to do is print a warning.
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3] Fix missing L2 cache size in /sys/devices/system/cpu
2015-03-26 4:49 ` [v3] " Michael Ellerman
@ 2015-03-26 19:49 ` Dave Olson
2015-03-26 23:39 ` Michael Ellerman
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Olson @ 2015-03-26 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-26-02 at 00:04:47 UTC, Dave Olson wrote:
> > @@ -324,14 +335,33 @@ static bool cache_node_is_unified(const struct device_node *np)
> > return of_get_property(np, "cache-unified", NULL);
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Handle unified caches that have two different types of tags. Most embedded
> > + * use cache-size, etc. for the unified cache size, but open firmware systems
> > + * use d-cache-size, etc. Since they all appear to be consistent, check on
> > + * initialization for which type we are, and use the appropriate structure.
> > + */
> > static struct cache *cache_do_one_devnode_unified(struct device_node *node,
> > int level)
> > {
> > struct cache *cache;
> > + int ucache;
> >
> > pr_debug("creating L%d ucache for %s\n", level, node->full_name);
> >
> > cache = new_cache(CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level, node);
> ^^
>
> > + if (of_get_property(node,
> > + cache_type_info[CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D].size_prop, NULL)) {
> > + ucache = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D;
> > + } else {
> > + ucache = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED; /* assume embedded */
> > + if (of_get_property(node,
> > + cache_type_info[CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED].size_prop, NULL) ==
> > + NULL)
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING "Unified cache property missing\n");
> > + }
> > +
> > + cache = new_cache(ucache, level, node);
> ^^
> >
> > return cache;
> > }
>
> That looks fishy. You create a cache, and then throw it away and create another
> one and return that. I don't think that's what you intended, is it?
It looks like I missed something when I regenerated the patch, yes.
My version of cacheinfo.c doesn't have the first new_cache() call.
> It would also be cleaner I think if you created another helper, eg.
> cache_is_unified_d() to do the property lookup.
OK.
> And also I don't think you need to do the second property lookup, especially if
> all you're going to do is print a warning.
I wanted to make sure that if a similar issue arose in the future, that
a message was printed so it got caught and fixed. I don't see a way
to do that without the 2nd lookup.
Let me know what you think, and I'll generate another patch.
Dave Olson
olson@cumulusnetworks.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3] Fix missing L2 cache size in /sys/devices/system/cpu
2015-03-26 19:49 ` Dave Olson
@ 2015-03-26 23:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-04-03 3:33 ` [PATCH] " olson
2015-04-03 4:28 ` [PATCHv5 1/1] " olson
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2015-03-26 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Olson; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 12:49 -0700, Dave Olson wrote:
> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2015-26-02 at 00:04:47 UTC, Dave Olson wrote:
> > > @@ -324,14 +335,33 @@ static bool cache_node_is_unified(const struct device_node *np)
> > > return of_get_property(np, "cache-unified", NULL);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * Handle unified caches that have two different types of tags. Most embedded
> > > + * use cache-size, etc. for the unified cache size, but open firmware systems
> > > + * use d-cache-size, etc. Since they all appear to be consistent, check on
> > > + * initialization for which type we are, and use the appropriate structure.
> > > + */
> > > static struct cache *cache_do_one_devnode_unified(struct device_node *node,
> > > int level)
> > > {
> > > struct cache *cache;
> > > + int ucache;
> > >
> > > pr_debug("creating L%d ucache for %s\n", level, node->full_name);
> > >
> > > cache = new_cache(CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level, node);
> > ^^
> >
> > > + if (of_get_property(node,
> > > + cache_type_info[CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D].size_prop, NULL)) {
> > > + ucache = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D;
> > > + } else {
> > > + ucache = CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED; /* assume embedded */
> > > + if (of_get_property(node,
> > > + cache_type_info[CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED].size_prop, NULL) ==
> > > + NULL)
> > > + printk(KERN_WARNING "Unified cache property missing\n");
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + cache = new_cache(ucache, level, node);
> > ^^
> > >
> > > return cache;
> > > }
> >
> > That looks fishy. You create a cache, and then throw it away and create another
> > one and return that. I don't think that's what you intended, is it?
>
> It looks like I missed something when I regenerated the patch, yes.
> My version of cacheinfo.c doesn't have the first new_cache() call.
OK, not sure how you did that. I recommend using git to generate the patch.
> > And also I don't think you need to do the second property lookup, especially if
> > all you're going to do is print a warning.
>
> I wanted to make sure that if a similar issue arose in the future, that
> a message was printed so it got caught and fixed. I don't see a way
> to do that without the 2nd lookup.
That's an admirable goal but I don't think that's the right way to catch it. If
it's important then someone needs to be testing the end result, ie. the
contents of /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/cache.
Also a single printk is never going to get noticed in the boot log, unless
someone's already looking for it.
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Fix missing L2 cache size in /sys/devices/system/cpu
2015-03-26 19:49 ` Dave Olson
2015-03-26 23:39 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2015-04-03 3:33 ` olson
2015-04-03 4:28 ` [PATCHv5 1/1] " olson
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: olson @ 2015-04-03 3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman
Cc: linuxppc-dev, Dave Olson
From: Dave Olson <olson@cumulusnetworks.com>
This is version 4 of the patch, incorporating Michael Ellerman's
suggested changes from March 26, 2015.
================
This problem appears to have been introduced in 2.6.29 by
the commit in the Fixes line below.
This caused lscpu to error out on e500v2 devices, and probably others
error: cannot open /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index2/size: No such file or directory
Some embedded powerpc systems use cache-size in DTS for the unified L2 cache
size, not d-cache-size, so we need to allow for both DTS names. Added a
new CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D cache_type_info structure to handle this.
Fixes: 93197a36a9c16a85fb24cf5a8639f7bf9af838a3
Signed-off-by: Dave Olson <olson@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
index ae77b7e..b9df547 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
@@ -61,12 +61,22 @@ struct cache_type_info {
};
/* These are used to index the cache_type_info array. */
-#define CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED 0
-#define CACHE_TYPE_INSTRUCTION 1
-#define CACHE_TYPE_DATA 2
+#define CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED 0 /* cache-size, cache-block-size, etc. */
+#define CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D 1 /* d-cache-size, d-cache-block-size, etc */
+#define CACHE_TYPE_INSTRUCTION 2
+#define CACHE_TYPE_DATA 3
static const struct cache_type_info cache_type_info[] = {
{
+ /* Embedded systems that use cache-size, cache-block-size,
+ * etc. for the Unified (typically L2) cache. */
+ .name = "Unified",
+ .size_prop = "cache-size",
+ .line_size_props = { "cache-line-size",
+ "cache-block-size", },
+ .nr_sets_prop = "cache-sets",
+ },
+ {
/* PowerPC Processor binding says the [di]-cache-*
* must be equal on unified caches, so just use
* d-cache properties. */
@@ -293,7 +303,8 @@ static struct cache *cache_find_first_sibling(struct cache *cache)
{
struct cache *iter;
- if (cache->type == CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED)
+ if (cache->type == CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED ||
+ cache->type == CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D)
return cache;
list_for_each_entry(iter, &cache_list, list)
@@ -324,16 +335,29 @@ static bool cache_node_is_unified(const struct device_node *np)
return of_get_property(np, "cache-unified", NULL);
}
-static struct cache *cache_do_one_devnode_unified(struct device_node *node,
- int level)
+/*
+ * Unified caches can have two different sets of tags. Most embedded
+ * use cache-size, etc. for the unified cache size, but open firmware systems
+ * use d-cache-size, etc. Check on initialization for which type we have, and
+ * return the appropriate structure type. Assume it's embedded if it isn't
+ * open firmware. If it's yet a 3rd type, then there will be missing entries
+ * in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index2/, and this code will need
+ * to be extended further.
+ */
+static int __cpuinit cache_is_unified_d(const struct device_node *np)
{
- struct cache *cache;
+ return of_get_property(np,
+ cache_type_info[CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D].size_prop, NULL) ?
+ CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D : CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
+}
+/*
+ */
+static struct cache *__cpuinit cache_do_one_devnode_unified(struct device_node *node, int level)
+{
pr_debug("creating L%d ucache for %s\n", level, node->full_name);
- cache = new_cache(CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level, node);
-
- return cache;
+ return new_cache(cache_is_unified_d(node), level, node);
}
static struct cache *cache_do_one_devnode_split(struct device_node *node,
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv5 1/1] Fix missing L2 cache size in /sys/devices/system/cpu
2015-03-26 19:49 ` Dave Olson
2015-03-26 23:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-04-03 3:33 ` [PATCH] " olson
@ 2015-04-03 4:28 ` olson
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: olson @ 2015-04-03 4:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Paul Mackerras, Michael Ellerman
Cc: Dave Olson, linuxppc-dev
From: Dave Olson <olson@cumulusnetworks.com>
This is version 5 of the patch, incorporating Michael Ellerman's
suggested changes from March 26, 2015. v5 removes the __cpuinit
that had crept in from my patch based on an older kernel, but is
otherwise the same as v4.
================
This problem appears to have been introduced in 2.6.29 by
the commit in the Fixes line below.
This caused lscpu to error out on e500v2 devices, and probably others
error: cannot open /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index2/size: No such file or directory
Some embedded powerpc systems use cache-size in DTS for the unified L2 cache
size, not d-cache-size, so we need to allow for both DTS names. Added a
new CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D cache_type_info structure to handle this.
Fixes: 93197a36a9c16a85fb24cf5a8639f7bf9af838a3
Signed-off-by: Dave Olson <olson@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
index ae77b7e..c641983 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cacheinfo.c
@@ -61,12 +61,22 @@ struct cache_type_info {
};
/* These are used to index the cache_type_info array. */
-#define CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED 0
-#define CACHE_TYPE_INSTRUCTION 1
-#define CACHE_TYPE_DATA 2
+#define CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED 0 /* cache-size, cache-block-size, etc. */
+#define CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D 1 /* d-cache-size, d-cache-block-size, etc */
+#define CACHE_TYPE_INSTRUCTION 2
+#define CACHE_TYPE_DATA 3
static const struct cache_type_info cache_type_info[] = {
{
+ /* Embedded systems that use cache-size, cache-block-size,
+ * etc. for the Unified (typically L2) cache. */
+ .name = "Unified",
+ .size_prop = "cache-size",
+ .line_size_props = { "cache-line-size",
+ "cache-block-size", },
+ .nr_sets_prop = "cache-sets",
+ },
+ {
/* PowerPC Processor binding says the [di]-cache-*
* must be equal on unified caches, so just use
* d-cache properties. */
@@ -293,7 +303,8 @@ static struct cache *cache_find_first_sibling(struct cache *cache)
{
struct cache *iter;
- if (cache->type == CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED)
+ if (cache->type == CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED ||
+ cache->type == CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D)
return cache;
list_for_each_entry(iter, &cache_list, list)
@@ -324,16 +335,29 @@ static bool cache_node_is_unified(const struct device_node *np)
return of_get_property(np, "cache-unified", NULL);
}
-static struct cache *cache_do_one_devnode_unified(struct device_node *node,
- int level)
+/*
+ * Unified caches can have two different sets of tags. Most embedded
+ * use cache-size, etc. for the unified cache size, but open firmware systems
+ * use d-cache-size, etc. Check on initialization for which type we have, and
+ * return the appropriate structure type. Assume it's embedded if it isn't
+ * open firmware. If it's yet a 3rd type, then there will be missing entries
+ * in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cache/index2/, and this code will need
+ * to be extended further.
+ */
+static int cache_is_unified_d(const struct device_node *np)
{
- struct cache *cache;
+ return of_get_property(np,
+ cache_type_info[CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D].size_prop, NULL) ?
+ CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED_D : CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED;
+}
+/*
+ */
+static struct cache *cache_do_one_devnode_unified(struct device_node *node, int level)
+{
pr_debug("creating L%d ucache for %s\n", level, node->full_name);
- cache = new_cache(CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level, node);
-
- return cache;
+ return new_cache(cache_is_unified_d(node), level, node);
}
static struct cache *cache_do_one_devnode_split(struct device_node *node,
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-03 4:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-26 0:04 [PATCH v3] Fix missing L2 cache size in /sys/devices/system/cpu olson
2015-03-26 4:49 ` [v3] " Michael Ellerman
2015-03-26 19:49 ` Dave Olson
2015-03-26 23:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-04-03 3:33 ` [PATCH] " olson
2015-04-03 4:28 ` [PATCHv5 1/1] " olson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).