linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] clockevents: Fix cpu down race for hrtimer based broadcasting
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 13:31:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150402113141.GB14370@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <551D2733.7040108@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


* Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 04/02/2015 04:12 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> It was found when doing a hotplug stress test on POWER, that the machine
> >> either hit softlockups or rcu_sched stall warnings.  The issue was
> >> traced to commit 7cba160ad789a powernv/cpuidle: Redesign idle states
> >> management, which exposed the cpu down race with hrtimer based broadcast
> >> mode(Commit 5d1638acb9f6(tick: Introduce hrtimer based broadcast). This
> >> is explained below.
> >>
> >> Assume CPU1 is the CPU which holds the hrtimer broadcasting duty before
> >> it is taken down.
> >>
> >> CPU0					CPU1
> >>
> >> cpu_down()				take_cpu_down()
> >> 					disable_interrupts()
> >>
> >> cpu_die()
> >>
> >>  while(CPU1 != CPU_DEAD) {
> >>   msleep(100);
> >>    switch_to_idle();
> >>     stop_cpu_timer();
> >>      schedule_broadcast();
> >>  }
> >>
> >> tick_cleanup_cpu_dead()
> >> 	take_over_broadcast()
> >>
> >> So after CPU1 disabled interrupts it cannot handle the broadcast hrtimer
> >> anymore, so CPU0 will be stuck forever.
> >>
> >> Fix this by explicitly taking over broadcast duty before cpu_die().
> >> This is a temporary workaround. What we really want is a callback in the
> >> clockevent device which allows us to do that from the dying CPU by
> >> pushing the hrtimer onto a different cpu. That might involve an IPI and
> >> is definitely more complex than this immediate fix.
> > 
> > So why not use a suitable CPU_DOWN* notifier for this, instead of open 
> > coding it all into a random place in the hotplug machinery?
> 
> This is because each of them is unsuitable for a reason:
> 
> 1. CPU_DOWN_PREPARE stage allows for a fail. The cpu in question may not
> successfully go down. So we may pull the hrtimer unnecessarily.

Failure is really rare - and as long as things will continue to work 
afterwards it's not a problem to pull the hrtimer to this CPU. Right?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-02 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-30  9:29 [PATCH V2] clockevents: Fix cpu down race for hrtimer based broadcasting Preeti U Murthy
2015-03-31  3:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-04-02 10:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-02 11:25   ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-04-02 11:31     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-04-02 11:44       ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-04-02 12:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-02 12:12     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-02 12:44       ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-04-02 12:58       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150402113141.GB14370@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).