From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
Bharat Bhushan <Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE..." <x86@kernel.org>,
agraf@suse.de, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
zhichao.huang@linaro.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com,
Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>,
bp@suse.de, drjones@redhat.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
r65777@freescale.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"open list:ABI/API" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC..." <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] KVM: define common __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW/HW_BP values
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:55:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150413115535.GM6186@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427814488-28467-3-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:08:00PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Currently x86, powerpc and soon arm64 use the same two architecture
> specific bits for guest debug support for software and hardware
> breakpoints. This makes the shared values explicit while leaving the
> gate open for another architecture to use some other value if they
> really really want to.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index ab4d473..1731569 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -310,8 +310,8 @@ struct kvm_guest_debug_arch {
> * and upper 16 bits are architecture specific. Architecture specific defines
> * that ioctl is for setting hardware breakpoint or software breakpoint.
> */
> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP 0x00010000
> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP 0x00020000
> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP
> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP
>
> /* definition of registers in kvm_run */
> struct kvm_sync_regs {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index d7dcef5..1438202 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -250,8 +250,8 @@ struct kvm_debug_exit_arch {
> __u64 dr7;
> };
>
> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP 0x00010000
> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP 0x00020000
> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP
> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP
> #define KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_DB 0x00040000
> #define KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_BP 0x00080000
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 5eedf84..ce2db14 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -525,8 +525,16 @@ struct kvm_s390_irq {
>
> /* for KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG */
>
> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE 0x00000001
> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP 0x00000002
> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE (1 << 0)
> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP (1 << 1)
> +
> +/*
> + * Architecture specific stuff uses the top 16 bits of the field,
can you be more specific than 'stuff' here? features?
> + * however there is some shared commonality for the common cases
I don't like this sentence; shared commonality is a pleonasm and the use
of however makes it sounds like there's some caveat here.
If the top 16 bits are indeed arhictecture specific, then I think they
should just be defined in their architecture specific headers. Unless
the idea here is that there's a fixed set of of flags that architectures
can choose to support, in which case it should simply be defined in the
common header.
> + */
> +#define __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP (1 << 16)
> +#define __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP (1 << 17)
> +
>
> struct kvm_guest_debug {
> __u32 control;
> --
> 2.3.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-13 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1427814488-28467-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2015-03-31 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] KVM: define common __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW/HW_BP values Alex Bennée
2015-04-10 12:59 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-13 11:55 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2015-04-13 14:51 ` Alex Bennée
2015-04-13 15:07 ` Andrew Jones
2015-04-14 8:24 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150413115535.GM6186@cbox \
--to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mihai.caraman@freescale.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=r65777@freescale.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhichao.huang@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).