linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] pci: Use QEMU created PCI device nodes
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 12:14:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150427121443.0d125901@thh440s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y4ldc2tr.fsf@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com>

On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:26:00 +0530
Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:32:33 +0530
> > Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> PCI Enumeration has been part of SLOF. Now with hotplug code addition
> >> in QEMU, it makes more sense to have this code in one place,
> >> i.e. QEMU.
> >> 
> >> Adding routines to walk through the device nodes created by QEMU. SLOF
> >> will now configure the device/bridges and program the BARs for
> >> communicating with the devices.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  board-qemu/slof/pci-phb.fs | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>  slof/fs/pci-properties.fs  |  6 +++++-
> >>  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/board-qemu/slof/pci-phb.fs b/board-qemu/slof/pci-phb.fs
> >> index 529772f..a8fb7ca 100644
> >> --- a/board-qemu/slof/pci-phb.fs
> >> +++ b/board-qemu/slof/pci-phb.fs
> >> @@ -282,6 +282,41 @@ setup-puid
> >>     THEN
> >>  ;
> >>  
> >> +: phb-pci-walk-bridge ( -- )
> >> +    phb-debug? IF ."   Calling pci-walk-bridge " pwd cr THEN
> >> +
> >> +    get-node child ?dup 0= IF EXIT THEN    \ get and check if we have children
> >> +    0 to pci-device-slots                  \ reset slot array to unpoppulated
> >> +    BEGIN
> >> +        dup                                \ Continue as long as there are children
> >> +    WHILE
> >> +        dup set-node                       \ Set child node as current node
> >> +        my-space pci-set-slot              \ set the slot bit
> >> +        my-space pci-htype@                \ read HEADER-Type
> >> +        7f and                             \ Mask bit 7 - multifunction device
> >> +        CASE
> >> +            0 OF my-space pci-device-setup ENDOF  \ | set up the device
> >> +            1 OF my-space pci-bridge-setup ENDOF  \ | set up the bridge
> >> +            dup OF my-space pci-htype@ pci-out ENDOF
> >> +        ENDCASE
> >> +        peer
> >> +    REPEAT drop
> >> +    get-parent set-node
> >> +;
> >> +
> >> +\ Landing routing to probe the popuated device tree
> >> +: phb-pci-probe-bus ( busnr -- )
> >> +    drop phb-pci-walk-bridge
> >> +;
> >> +
> >> +\ Stub routine, as qemu has enumerated, we already have the device
> >> +\ properties set.
> >> +: phb-pci-device-props ( addr -- )
> >> +    dup pci-class-name device-name
> >> +    dup pci-device-assigned-addresses-prop
> >> +    drop
> >> +;
> >> +
> >>  \ Scan the child nodes of the pci root node to assign bars, fixup
> >>  \ properties etc.
> >>  : phb-setup-children
> >> @@ -289,7 +324,14 @@ setup-puid
> >>     my-puid TO puid                  \ Set current puid
> >>     phb-parse-ranges
> >>     1 TO pci-hotplug-enabled
> >> -   1 0 (probe-pci-host-bridge)
> >> +   s" qemu,phb-enumerated" get-node get-property 0<> IF
> >
> > I think you could simply omit the "0<>" in the above line (get-property
> > returns TRUE if the property has not been found and FALSE if it has
> > been found, so the topmost stack item is already suitable for the IF
> > statement)
> 
> I find the usage of get-property a bit odd, as it returns TRUE when it
> is not found. So have put " != 0"  as the condition, which I felt as more
> intuitive.
> 
> If you don't feel strongly about it, I will like to have it this way.

That's fine for me, too.

 Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-27 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-27  8:02 [PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: Generic fixes and moving enumeration back to QEMU Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-04-27  8:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] pci: program correct bridge limit registers during probe Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-04-27  8:17   ` Thomas Huth
2015-04-27  8:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] pci: Support 64-bit address translation Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-04-27  9:32   ` Thomas Huth
2015-04-27  9:57     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-04-27 10:12       ` Thomas Huth
2015-04-27  8:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] usb: support 64-bit pci bars Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-04-27  8:26   ` Thomas Huth
2015-04-27  8:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] pci: Use QEMU created PCI device nodes Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-04-27  8:38   ` Thomas Huth
2015-04-27  9:56     ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-04-27 10:14       ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2015-04-29  3:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] PCI: Generic fixes and moving enumeration back to QEMU Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-04-29  5:22   ` Nikunj A Dadhania

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150427121443.0d125901@thh440s \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).