From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4941A00E9 for ; Fri, 8 May 2015 16:18:35 +1000 (AEST) Received: by wgic8 with SMTP id c8so36577076wgi.1 for ; Thu, 07 May 2015 23:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Ingo Molnar Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 08:18:28 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Hemant Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf/kvm: Port perf kvm to powerpc Message-ID: <20150508061828.GA4647@gmail.com> References: <1431047266-6206-1-git-send-email-hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150508042853.GA24391@gmail.com> <554C54D1.9060301@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <554C54D1.9060301@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, agraf@suse.de, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, acme@kernel.org, warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Hemant Kumar wrote: > > On 05/08/2015 09:58 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >* Hemant Kumar wrote: > > > >> # perf kvm stat report -p 60515 > >>Analyze events for pid(s) 60515, all VCPUs: > >> > >> VM-EXIT Samples Samples% Time% Min Time Max Time Avg time > >> > >>H_DATA_STORAGE 5006 35.30% 0.13% 1.94us 49.46us 12.37us ( +- 0.52% ) > >>HV_DECREMENTER 4457 31.43% 0.02% 0.72us 16.14us 1.91us ( +- 0.96% ) > >> SYSCALL 2690 18.97% 0.10% 2.84us 528.24us 18.29us ( +- 3.75% ) > >>RETURN_TO_HOST 1789 12.61% 99.76% 1.58us 672791.91us 27470.23us ( +- 3.00% ) > >> EXTERNAL 240 1.69% 0.00% 0.69us 10.67us 1.33us ( +- 5.34% ) > >Where is the last line misaligned? Copy & paste error or does perf kvm > >produce it in such a way? > > Its a copy-paste error. Thanks for pointing this out. > > Shall I resend the patches with the correct alignment of the o/p? I don't think that's necessary, as long as the code is fine. Thanks, Ingo