From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 601051A1D13 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:59:09 +1000 (AEST) In-Reply-To: <1434022072-31754-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> To: Rasmus Villemoes , Ian Munsie , Michael Neuling From: Michael Ellerman Cc: Joe Perches , Rasmus Villemoes , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [v3,1/2] cxl: Add explicit precision specifiers Message-Id: <20150716095909.3C4701402B5@ozlabs.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:59:09 +1000 (AEST) List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2015-11-06 at 11:27:51 UTC, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits > or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation, > however, treats this case as if the precision was omitted. C99 also > says that if both the precision and value are 0, no digits should be > printed. Even if the kernel followed C99 to the letter, I don't think > that would be particularly useful in these cases. For consistency with > most other format strings in the file, use an explicit precision of 16 > and add a 0x prefix. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes Applied to powerpc next, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/80c394fab89649585089 cheers