From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3A4C1A075D for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:29:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from /spool/local by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:29:30 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.29]) by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F0FC90043 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:20:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t6GLTRrE63111350 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:29:27 GMT Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t6GLTRqQ023009 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:29:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:28:18 -0700 From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Michael Ellerman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] perf: Add a flags parameter to pmu txn interfaces Message-ID: <20150716212818.GA31962@us.ibm.com> References: <1436929315-28520-1-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1436929315-28520-4-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150716201749.GL3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20150716201749.GL3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Peter Zijlstra [peterz@infradead.org] wrote: | On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:01:50PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: | > @@ -1604,6 +1613,12 @@ static void power_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu) | > static void power_pmu_cancel_txn(struct pmu *pmu) | > { | > struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events); | > + int txn_flags; | > + | > + txn_flags = cpuhw->txn_flags; | > + cpuhw->txn_flags = 0; | > + if (cpuhw->txn_flags & ~PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD) | > + return; | | That seems, unintentional? ;-) Argh. Thanks for catching it. Sukadev