linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: aik@ozlabs.ru, gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] powerpc/powernv: boundary the total vf bar size instead of the individual one
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:28:51 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150806052851.GA5636@gwshan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438737903-10399-6-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:25:02AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>Each VF could have 6 BARs at most. When the total BAR size exceeds the
>gate, after expanding it will also exhaust the M64 Window.
>
>This patch limits the boundary by checking the total VF BAR size instead of
>the individual BAR.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Ok. I didn't look at this when giving comments to last patch. It turns
you have the change in this patch. Please merge it with the previous
patch.

>---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c |   13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>index 31dcedc..4042303 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>@@ -2702,7 +2702,7 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 	struct pnv_phb *phb;
> 	struct resource *res;
> 	int i;
>-	resource_size_t size, gate;
>+	resource_size_t size, gate, total_vf_bar_sz;
> 	struct pci_dn *pdn;
> 	int mul, total_vfs;
>
>@@ -2729,6 +2729,7 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 	 * Window and limit the system flexibility.
> 	 */
> 	gate = phb->ioda.m64_segsize >> 1;
>+	total_vf_bar_sz = 0;
>
> 	for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> 		res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
>@@ -2741,13 +2742,13 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 			return;
> 		}
>
>-		size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
>+		total_vf_bar_sz += pci_iov_resource_size(pdev,
>+				i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
>
> 		/* bigger than or equal to gate */
>-		if (size >= gate) {
>-			dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PowerNV: VF BAR%d: %pR IOV size "
>-				"is bigger than %lld, roundup power2\n",
>-				 i, res, gate);
>+		if (total_vf_bar_sz >= gate) {
>+			dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PowerNV: VF BAR Total IOV size "
>+				"is bigger than %lld, roundup power2\n", gate);
> 			mul = roundup_pow_of_two(total_vfs);
> 			pdn->m64_single_mode = true;
> 			break;
>-- 
>1.7.9.5
>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-06  5:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-29  7:22 [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: use one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for one VF BAR Wei Yang
2015-07-30  1:15 ` Gavin Shan
2015-07-30  5:43   ` Wei Yang
2015-07-31  0:13     ` Gavin Shan
2015-07-31  2:01       ` Wei Yang
2015-08-05  1:24         ` [PATCH V2 0/6] Redesign SR-IOV on PowerNV Wei Yang
2015-08-05  1:24           ` [PATCH V2 1/6] powerpc/powernv: don't enable SRIOV when VF BAR contains non M64 BAR Wei Yang
2015-08-06  4:35             ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06  6:10               ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-06  6:57                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06  7:47                   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-06 11:07                     ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 14:13                     ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  1:24                       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-06 14:10               ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  1:20                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  2:24                   ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  3:50                     ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  7:14                     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-10  1:40                       ` Wei Yang
2015-08-05  1:24           ` [PATCH V2 2/6] powerpc/powernv: simplify the calculation of iov resource Wei Yang
2015-08-06  4:51             ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06  9:00               ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-06  9:41                 ` Wei Yang
2015-08-06 10:15                   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-07  1:36                     ` Wei Yang
2015-08-06 13:49               ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  1:08                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-05  1:25           ` [PATCH V2 3/6] powerpc/powernv: use one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for one VF BAR Wei Yang
2015-08-06  5:20             ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06  9:36               ` Wei Yang
2015-08-06 10:07                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  1:48                   ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  8:13                     ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-06 10:04             ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-07  2:01               ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  8:59                 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-10  1:48                   ` Wei Yang
2015-08-05  1:25           ` [PATCH V2 4/6] powerpc/powernv: replace the hard coded boundary with gate Wei Yang
2015-08-06  5:26             ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  9:11               ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-08-05  1:25           ` [PATCH V2 5/6] powerpc/powernv: boundary the total vf bar size instead of the individual one Wei Yang
2015-08-06  5:28             ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2015-08-06 14:03               ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  1:23                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  2:25                   ` Wei Yang
2015-08-05  1:25           ` [PATCH V2 6/6] powerpc/powernv: allocate discrete PE# when using M64 BAR in Single PE mode Wei Yang
2015-08-06  5:36             ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-06 13:41               ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  1:36                 ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  2:33                   ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  3:43                     ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  5:44                       ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07  5:54                         ` Gavin Shan
2015-08-07  6:25                           ` Wei Yang
2015-08-07 10:00                           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150806052851.GA5636@gwshan \
    --to=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).