From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com (e23smtp05.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEE251A1C10 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:40:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp05.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:40:58 +1000 Received: from d23relay08.au.ibm.com (d23relay08.au.ibm.com [9.185.71.33]) by d23dlp02.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDFC2BB005C for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:40:56 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay08.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t7B0eg0x852344 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:40:50 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t7B0eMxR010328 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:40:23 +1000 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:40:05 +1000 From: Gavin Shan To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: Gavin Shan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, bhelgaas@google.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, robherring2@gmail.com, panto@antoniou-consulting.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 17/42] powerpc/powernv: Rename PE# fields in PHB Message-ID: <20150811004005.GB18981@gwshan> Reply-To: Gavin Shan References: <1438834307-26960-1-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1438834307-26960-18-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <55C8B35C.4040501@ozlabs.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <55C8B35C.4040501@ozlabs.ru> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:21:16AM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 08/06/2015 02:11 PM, Gavin Shan wrote: >>This renames the fields related to PE# in "struct pnv_phb" for >>better reflecting of their usages as Alexey suggested. It doesn't >>introduce behavioural changes. >> >>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan > > >Makes sense to move this to the beginning of the patchset as patches prior >this are changing the same lines as this patch changes. > Ok. I'll try to reorder the patch... Thanks, Gavin