From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: MSI: Fix race condition in tearing down MSI interrupts
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:26:41 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150910052641.GB21735@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441860908.31931.6.camel@ellerman.id.au>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:55:08PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 14:36 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > This fixes a race which can result in the same virtual IRQ number
> > being assigned to two different MSI interrupts. The most visible
> > consequence of that is usually a warning and stack trace from the
> > sysfs code about an attempt to create a duplicate entry in sysfs.
> >
> > The race happens when one CPU (say CPU 0) is disposing of an MSI
> > while another CPU (say CPU 1) is setting up an MSI. CPU 0 calls
> > (for example) pnv_teardown_msi_irqs(), which calls
> > msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs() to indicate that the MSI (i.e. its
> > hardware IRQ number) is no longer in use. Then, before CPU 0 gets
> > to calling irq_dispose_mapping() to free up the virtal IRQ number,
> > CPU 1 comes in and calls msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs() to allocate an
> > MSI, and gets the same hardware IRQ number that CPU 0 just freed.
> > CPU 1 then calls irq_create_mapping() to get a virtual IRQ number,
> > which sees that there is currently a mapping for that hardware IRQ
> > number and returns the corresponding virtual IRQ number (which is
> > the same virtual IRQ number that CPU 0 was using). CPU 0 then
> > calls irq_dispose_mapping() and frees that virtual IRQ number.
> > Now, if another CPU comes along and calls irq_create_mapping(), it
> > is likely to get the virtual IRQ number that was just freed,
> > resulting in the same virtual IRQ number apparently being used for
> > two different hardware interrupts.
> >
> > To fix this race, we just move the call to msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs()
> > to after the call to irq_dispose_mapping(). Since virq_to_hw()
> > doesn't work for the virtual IRQ number after irq_dispose_mapping()
> > has been called, we need to call it before irq_dispose_mapping() and
> > remember the result for the msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs() call.
> >
> > The pattern of calling msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs() before
> > irq_dispose_mapping() appears in 5 places under arch/powerpc, and
> > appears to have originated in commit 05af7bd2d75e ("[POWERPC] MPIC
> > U3/U4 MSI backend") from 2007.
>
> Guilty.
>
> Any reason this shouldn't go to stable too?
The patch doesn't apply cleanly as-is to previous kernel versions due
to commit 2921d1790eee ("powerpc/PCI: Use for_pci_msi_entry() to
access MSI device list") changing some of the context lines. Other
than that yes it probably should go to stable too.
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/msi.c | 5 +++--
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.c | 5 +++--
> > arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.c | 5 +++--
> > arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic_u3msi.c | 5 +++--
> > arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_msi.c | 5 +++--
> > 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> I assume you've tested on powernv, but none of the other platforms?
Compile tested on all relevant platforms, but booted only on powernv.
Alexey verified that on powernv he no longer sees the splat from
sysfs with the patch applied.
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-10 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-10 4:36 [PATCH] powerpc: MSI: Fix race condition in tearing down MSI interrupts Paul Mackerras
2015-09-10 4:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-10 5:26 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2015-09-14 2:55 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150910052641.GB21735@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).