From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0621E1A04E5 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:13:29 +1000 (AEST) In-Reply-To: <1442293447-1843-1-git-send-email-dja@axtens.net> To: Daniel Axtens , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org From: Michael Ellerman Cc: mikey@neuling.org, imunsie@au1.ibm.com, andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com, Daniel Axtens Subject: Re: [v2] cxl: Fix unbalanced pci_dev_get in cxl_probe Message-Id: <20150917051328.A67EA140291@ozlabs.org> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:13:28 +1000 (AEST) List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2015-15-09 at 05:04:07 UTC, Daniel Axtens wrote: > Currently the first thing we do in cxl_probe is to grab a reference > on the pci device. Later on, we call device_register on our adapter. > In our remove path, we call device_unregister, but we never call > pci_dev_put. We therefore leak the device every time we do a > reflash. > > device_register/unregister is sufficient to hold the reference. > Therefore, drop the call to pci_dev_get. > > Here's why this is safe. > The proposed cxl_probe(pdev) calls cxl_adapter_init: > a) init calls cxl_adapter_alloc, which creates a struct cxl, > conventionally called adapter. This struct contains a > device entry, adapter->dev. > > b) init calls cxl_configure_adapter, where we set > adapter->dev.parent = &dev->dev (here dev is the pci dev) > > So at this point, the cxl adapter's device's parent is the PCI > device that I want to be refcounted properly. > > c) init calls cxl_register_adapter > *) cxl_register_adapter calls device_register(&adapter->dev) > > So now we're in device_register, where dev is the adapter device, and > we want to know if the PCI device is safe after we return. > > device_register(&adapter->dev) calls device_initialize() and then > device_add(). > > device_add() does a get_device(). device_add() also explicitly grabs > the device's parent, and calls get_device() on it: > > parent = get_device(dev->parent); > > So therefore, device_register() takes a lock on the parent PCI dev, > which is what pci_dev_get() was guarding. pci_dev_get() can therefore > be safely removed. > > Fixes: f204e0b8cedd ("cxl: Driver code for powernv PCIe based cards for userspace access") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens > Acked-by: Ian Munsie Applied to powerpc fixes, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/2925c2fdf1e0eb642482f5b3 cheers