From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>,
Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>,
Iyappan Subramanian <isubramanian@apm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Li Yang <leoli@freescale.com>, Keyur Chudgar <kchudgar@apm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Phy, mdiobus, and netdev struct device fixes
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 00:50:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150924225033.GI20825@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150924221541.GF21513@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
> Thanks for testing. Please could you confirm whether the same behaviour
> is observed without the patches, just to make absolutely sure that isn't
> a regression.
So i tested this now.
I have two FEC interfaces. One i my main access interface, and the
second is used by DSA to access switches. With your patches, the
module Used by count is equal to the number of interfaces which are
up.
Without your patches, the count is always 0.
When i try to remove the fec module, without your patches, but DSA
still using the interface, i get the same
kernel:unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth1 to become free. Usage count = 1
as with your patch. So this is not a regression.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-24 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-24 19:17 [PATCH v3 0/9] Phy, mdiobus, and netdev struct device fixes Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-24 19:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] net: fix phy refcounting in a bunch of drivers Russell King
2015-09-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Phy, mdiobus, and netdev struct device fixes Andrew Lunn
2015-09-24 22:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-24 22:50 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2015-09-24 23:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-24 22:15 ` David Miller
2015-09-24 22:26 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-09-24 22:51 ` David Miller
2015-09-24 23:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-25 1:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-09-25 6:05 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150924225033.GI20825@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=isubramanian@apm.com \
--cc=kchudgar@apm.com \
--cc=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=rric@kernel.org \
--cc=sgoutham@cavium.com \
--cc=soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).