* [PATCH 1/1] powerpc: Individual System V IPC system calls
@ 2015-09-24 5:39 Sam Bobroff
2015-09-25 0:33 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sam Bobroff @ 2015-09-24 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: anton, mikey
This patch provides individual system call numbers for the following
System V IPC system calls, on PowerPC, so that they do not need to be
multiplexed:
* semop, semget, semctl, semtimedop
* msgsnd, msgrcv, msgget, msgctl
* shmat, shmdt, shmget, shmctl
Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h | 12 ++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h | 12 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
index 71f2b3f..546b9ec 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
@@ -368,3 +368,15 @@ SYSCALL_SPU(memfd_create)
SYSCALL_SPU(bpf)
COMPAT_SYS(execveat)
PPC64ONLY(switch_endian)
+SYSCALL(semop)
+SYSCALL(semget)
+COMPAT_SYS(semctl)
+COMPAT_SYS(semtimedop)
+COMPAT_SYS(msgsnd)
+COMPAT_SYS(msgrcv)
+SYSCALL(msgget)
+COMPAT_SYS(msgctl)
+COMPAT_SYS(shmat)
+SYSCALL(shmdt)
+SYSCALL(shmget)
+COMPAT_SYS(shmctl)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
index f4f8b66..e51c51b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
#include <uapi/asm/unistd.h>
-#define __NR_syscalls 364
+#define __NR_syscalls 376
#define __NR__exit __NR_exit
#define NR_syscalls __NR_syscalls
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
index e4aa173..a8390ee 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
@@ -386,5 +386,17 @@
#define __NR_bpf 361
#define __NR_execveat 362
#define __NR_switch_endian 363
+#define __NR_semop 364
+#define __NR_semget 365
+#define __NR_semctl 366
+#define __NR_semtimedop 367
+#define __NR_msgsnd 368
+#define __NR_msgrcv 369
+#define __NR_msgget 370
+#define __NR_msgctl 371
+#define __NR_shmat 372
+#define __NR_shmdt 373
+#define __NR_shmget 374
+#define __NR_shmctl 375
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_UNISTD_H_ */
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc: Individual System V IPC system calls
2015-09-24 5:39 [PATCH 1/1] powerpc: Individual System V IPC system calls Sam Bobroff
@ 2015-09-25 0:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-25 0:59 ` Sam Bobroff
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2015-09-25 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam Bobroff; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, mikey, anton
On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 15:39 +1000, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> This patch provides individual system call numbers for the following
> System V IPC system calls, on PowerPC, so that they do not need to be
> multiplexed:
> * semop, semget, semctl, semtimedop
> * msgsnd, msgrcv, msgget, msgctl
> * shmat, shmdt, shmget, shmctl
Thanks.
Can you please rebase this on top of linux-next, where we have two new
syscalls wired up. It should be trivial, just the numbering changes, but I
think you have a modified libc to actually test the result.
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc: Individual System V IPC system calls
2015-09-25 0:33 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2015-09-25 0:59 ` Sam Bobroff
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sam Bobroff @ 2015-09-25 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, mikey, anton
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:33:37AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 15:39 +1000, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> > This patch provides individual system call numbers for the following
> > System V IPC system calls, on PowerPC, so that they do not need to be
> > multiplexed:
> > * semop, semget, semctl, semtimedop
> > * msgsnd, msgrcv, msgget, msgctl
> > * shmat, shmdt, shmget, shmctl
>
> Thanks.
>
> Can you please rebase this on top of linux-next, where we have two new
> syscalls wired up. It should be trivial, just the numbering changes, but I
> think you have a modified libc to actually test the result.
No problem, and yes I can test the glibc changes :-)
Cheers,
Sam.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-25 1:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-24 5:39 [PATCH 1/1] powerpc: Individual System V IPC system calls Sam Bobroff
2015-09-25 0:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-25 0:59 ` Sam Bobroff
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).