From: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram.es>
To: Denis Kirjanov <kda@linux-powerpc.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
Steve Munroe <sjmunroe@us.ibm.com>,
anton@samba.org, Aaron Sawdey <sawdey@us.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/selftest: Add gettimeofday() benchmark
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 11:37:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150925093746.GA21535@visitor2.iram.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJe8K2SDPFUXBtPcFUcu9=UwCA1rC2rcHzowSA-b=1G+9+6JA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:28:30PM +0300, Denis Kirjanov wrote:
> On 9/25/15, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Friday 25 September 2015 14:01:39 Michael Neuling wrote:
> >> This adds a benchmark directory to the powerpc selftests and adds a
> >> gettimeofday() benchmark to it.
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
> >>
> >
> > Any reason for keeping this powerpc specific? It seems generally useful.
> > and portable.
> You're right. Moreover, we can put some comment to the benchmark why
> we've made such decision to add it (reference to the commit
> "powerpc/vdso: Avoid link stack corruption in __get_datapage()")
Why gettimeofday? Isn't clock_gettime the modern variant?
BTW: dows anyone receive 2 copies of every messge in this thread ?
I do, and I suspect that this is due to the Cc: list having both
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org and linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org. I removed the
former for this reply.
Gabriel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-25 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-25 4:01 [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc: powerpc/vdso: Avoid link stack corruption in __get_datapage() Michael Neuling
2015-09-25 4:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/selftest: Add gettimeofday() benchmark Michael Neuling
2015-09-25 7:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-25 9:28 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-09-25 9:37 ` Gabriel Paubert [this message]
2015-09-25 12:47 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-09-28 8:58 ` Michael Neuling
2015-09-28 9:56 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-09-30 1:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-02 7:47 ` [v2,1/2] " Michael Ellerman
2015-09-25 4:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/vdso: Avoid link stack corruption in __get_datapage() Michael Neuling
2015-10-02 7:47 ` [v2, " Michael Ellerman
2015-10-02 8:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150925093746.GA21535@visitor2.iram.es \
--to=paubert@iram.es \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=kda@linux-powerpc.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=sawdey@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sjmunroe@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).