From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 02:19:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151007071911.GA31002@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444197649.6794.7.camel@ellerman.id.au>
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 05:00:49PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > It's also worth noting that the __flush_power7 uses tlbiel instead of tlbie.
>
> Yeah that's a good point. It's not clear if the swsusp code wants to a local or
> a global invalidate.
If I read the code right, this is called on the boot CPU when all the
non-boot CPUs are still (potentially) down, so if you would do a global
invalidate the non-boot CPUs might not even notice, so those need to do
a (local) invalidate after being brought up anyway? Or they probably
need it before being brought down at all? You figure it out, it makes
my brain hurt :-)
> As an alternative, can you try adding a .machine push / .machine "power4" /
> .machine pop, around the tlbie. That should tell the assembler to drop back to
> power4 mode for that instruction, which should then do the right thing. There
> are some examples in that file.
That will get the assembler to not complain, but it will assemble the wrong
instruction: the power7 instruction has the same opcode (but different
semantics). So if you assemble a "tlbie r4" in power4 mode, a newer CPU
will see it as a "tlbie r4,r0" and do the wrong thing.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-07 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-02 15:43 Missing operand for tlbie instruction on Power7 Laura Abbott
2015-10-02 19:03 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-10-02 20:15 ` Peter Bergner
2015-10-02 21:37 ` Denis Kirjanov
2015-10-02 22:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2015-10-02 22:12 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-03 2:24 ` Peter Bergner
2015-10-04 0:00 ` Segher Boessenkool
2015-10-06 0:39 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-06 3:35 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-06 18:25 ` Laura Abbott
2015-10-07 6:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-07 7:19 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2015-10-07 9:13 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-07 14:31 ` Josh Boyer
2015-10-08 0:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-08 0:15 ` Josh Boyer
2015-10-08 0:38 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151007071911.GA31002@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).