From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:1868:205::9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612681A0171 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:46:37 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 00:46:16 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Fengguang Wu Cc: Michael Ellerman , Christoph Hellwig , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Nishanth Aravamudan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Keith Busch , Paul Mackerras , kbuild-all@01.org, Matthew Wilcox , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Gibson Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH 4/5 v2] pseries/iommu: implement DDW-aware dma_get_page_shift Message-ID: <20151008074616.GA16089@infradead.org> References: <201510030421.d9fvrbXU%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <1444102746.16909.4.camel@ellerman.id.au> <20151007135602.GA17377@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <1444263119.31685.4.camel@ellerman.id.au> <20151008010603.GA24198@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20151008011609.GA25163@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20151008011609.GA25163@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Fengguang, I think this proactive testing does a little more harm than good in it's current form. While offering testing for patches that aren't in git trees and or by people that don't even have a git tree that the build bots known about does seem useful, blindly doing it for every patch against something that most likely isn't the right base seems counter intertuitive. We'll probaby need some annotation in the O/n mail that asks for a test and sets a base tree to actually make it useful. With those few tweaks it should be really useful! Maybe we should have a discussion about this at kernel summit? On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 09:16:09AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > And of course linux-kernel. More lists could be added in future. > > Thanks, > Fengguang ---end quoted text---