linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] barriers: introduce smp_mb__release_acquire and update documentation
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:44:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151009174418.GW3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151009112554.GB3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:25:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:51:29AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > The corresponding litmus tests are below.
> > 
> > How do people feel about including these in memory-barriers.txt? I find
> > them considerably easier to read than our current kernel code + list of
> > possible orderings + wall of text, but there's a good chance that my
> > brain has been corrupted from staring at this stuff for too long.
> 
> Your brain is corrupt (but then, so probably is mine, just differently
> so).
> 
> I've not yet mastered the knack of reading those things; then again, I
> suspect its not too hard, just not something I've had the time to play
> with.

It does take a bit of practice, but is worth the effort.  Of course,
I -would- say that.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-09 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1444215568-24732-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
     [not found] ` <20151007111915.GF17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
     [not found]   ` <20151007132317.GK16065@arm.com>
     [not found]     ` <20151007152501.GI3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2015-10-08  3:50       ` [PATCH v2] barriers: introduce smp_mb__release_acquire and update documentation Michael Ellerman
2015-10-08 11:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 12:59           ` Will Deacon
2015-10-08 22:17             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09  9:51               ` Will Deacon
2015-10-09 11:25                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-09 17:44                   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-10-09 17:43                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09 18:33                   ` Will Deacon
2015-10-12 23:30                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-20 14:20                       ` Boqun Feng
2015-10-08 21:44           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09  7:29             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-09  8:31             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-09  9:40               ` Will Deacon
2015-10-09 11:02                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-09 12:41                   ` Will Deacon
2015-10-09 11:12                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-09 12:51                   ` Will Deacon
2015-10-09 13:06                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-09 11:13                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-09 17:21                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-19  1:17                 ` Boqun Feng
2015-10-19 10:23                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-20  7:35                     ` Boqun Feng
2015-10-20 23:34                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-21  8:24                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-21 19:29                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-21 19:36                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-21 19:56                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-21 16:04                     ` David Laight
2015-10-21 19:34                       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151009174418.GW3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).