From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, panto@antoniou-consulting.com,
grant.likely@linaro.org, robherring2@gmail.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, frowand.list@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 23/50] powerpc/powernv: Use PE instead of number during setup and release
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 20:03:02 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151117090302.GD16586@gwshan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564AB64E.6060208@ozlabs.ru>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:08:30PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 11/05/2015 12:12 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>In current implementation, the PEs that are allocated or picked
>>from the reserved list are identified by PE number. The PE instance
>>has to be picked according to the PE number eventually. We have
>>same issue when PE is released.
>>
>>For pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe() and pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(), this returns
>>PE instance so that pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE() can use the allocated
>>or reserved PE instance directly. Also, pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE()
>>returns the reserved/allocated PE instance to be used in subsequent
>>patches. On the other hand, pnv_ioda_free_pe() uses PE instance
>>(not number) as its argument. No logical changes introduced.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>index 488e0f8..ae82df1 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static void pnv_ioda_reserve_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no)
>> pnv_ioda_init_pe(phb, pe_no);
>> }
>>
>>-static int pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>>+static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>> {
>> unsigned long pe;
>>
>>@@ -160,19 +160,20 @@ static int pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>> pe = find_next_zero_bit(phb->ioda.pe_alloc,
>> phb->ioda.total_pe_num, 0);
>> if (pe >= phb->ioda.total_pe_num)
>>- return IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>+ return NULL;
>> } while(test_and_set_bit(pe, phb->ioda.pe_alloc));
>>
>>- pnv_ioda_init_pe(phb, pe);
>>- return pe;
>>+ return pnv_ioda_init_pe(phb, pe);
>> }
>>
>>-static void pnv_ioda_free_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe)
>>+static void pnv_ioda_free_pe(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>> {
>>- WARN_ON(phb->ioda.pe_array[pe].pdev);
>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb = pe->phb;
>>+
>>+ WARN_ON(pe->pdev);
>>
>>- memset(&phb->ioda.pe_array[pe], 0, sizeof(struct pnv_ioda_pe));
>>- clear_bit(pe, phb->ioda.pe_alloc);
>>+ memset(pe, 0, sizeof(struct pnv_ioda_pe));
>>+ clear_bit(pe->pe_number, phb->ioda.pe_alloc);
>> }
>>
>> /* The default M64 BAR is shared by all PEs */
>>@@ -332,7 +333,7 @@ static void pnv_ioda_reserve_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus,
>> }
>> }
>>
>>-static int pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>>+static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>> {
>> struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>> struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>>@@ -342,7 +343,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>>
>> /* Root bus shouldn't use M64 */
>> if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
>>- return IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>+ return NULL;
>>
>> /* Allocate bitmap */
>> size = _ALIGN_UP(phb->ioda.total_pe_num / 8, sizeof(unsigned long));
>>@@ -350,7 +351,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>> if (!pe_alloc) {
>> pr_warn("%s: Out of memory !\n",
>> __func__);
>>- return IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>+ return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> /* Figure out reserved PE numbers by the PE */
>>@@ -363,7 +364,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>> */
>> if (bitmap_empty(pe_alloc, phb->ioda.total_pe_num)) {
>> kfree(pe_alloc);
>>- return IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>+ return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>>@@ -409,7 +410,7 @@ static int pnv_ioda_pick_m64_pe(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>> }
>>
>> kfree(pe_alloc);
>>- return master_pe->pe_number;
>>+ return master_pe;
>> }
>>
>> static void __init pnv_ioda_parse_m64_window(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>>@@ -988,28 +989,26 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_same_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
>> * subordinate PCI devices and buses. The second type of PE is normally
>> * orgiriated by PCIe-to-PCI bridge or PLX switch downstream ports.
>> */
>>-static void pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>>+static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>> {
>> struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>> struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>>- int pe_num = IODA_INVALID_PE;
>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe = NULL;
>>
>> /* Check if PE is determined by M64 */
>> if (phb->pick_m64_pe)
>>- pe_num = phb->pick_m64_pe(bus, all);
>>+ pe = phb->pick_m64_pe(bus, all);
>>
>> /* The PE number isn't pinned by M64 */
>>- if (pe_num == IODA_INVALID_PE)
>>- pe_num = pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(phb);
>>+ if (!pe)
>>+ pe = pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(phb);
>>
>>- if (pe_num == IODA_INVALID_PE) {
>>+ if (!pe) {
>> pr_warning("%s: Not enough PE# available for PCI bus %04x:%02x\n",
>> __func__, pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number);
>>- return;
>>+ return NULL;
>> }
>>
>>- pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pe_num];
>> pe->flags |= (all ? PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL : PNV_IODA_PE_BUS);
>> pe->pbus = bus;
>> pe->pdev = NULL;
>>@@ -1018,17 +1017,16 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>>
>> if (all)
>> pe_info(pe, "Secondary bus %d..%d associated with PE#%d\n",
>>- bus->busn_res.start, bus->busn_res.end, pe_num);
>>+ bus->busn_res.start, bus->busn_res.end, pe->pe_number);
>> else
>> pe_info(pe, "Secondary bus %d associated with PE#%d\n",
>>- bus->busn_res.start, pe_num);
>>+ bus->busn_res.start, pe->pe_number);
>>
>> if (pnv_ioda_configure_pe(phb, pe)) {
>> /* XXX What do we do here ? */
>>- if (pe_num)
>>- pnv_ioda_free_pe(phb, pe_num);
>>+ pnv_ioda_free_pe(pe);
>> pe->pbus = NULL;
>>- return;
>>+ return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> /* Associate it with all child devices */
>>@@ -1036,6 +1034,8 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all)
>>
>> /* Put PE to the list */
>> list_add_tail(&pe->list, &phb->ioda.pe_list);
>>+
>>+ return pe;
>> }
>>
>> static void pnv_ioda_setup_PEs(struct pci_bus *bus)
>>@@ -1267,7 +1267,7 @@ static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>
>> pnv_ioda_deconfigure_pe(phb, pe);
>>
>>- pnv_ioda_free_pe(phb, pe->pe_number);
>>+ pnv_ioda_free_pe(pe);
>> }
>> }
>>
>>@@ -1276,6 +1276,7 @@ void pnv_pci_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> struct pci_bus *bus;
>> struct pci_controller *hose;
>> struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>> struct pci_sriov *iov;
>> u16 num_vfs, i;
>>@@ -1300,8 +1301,11 @@ void pnv_pci_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> /* Release PE numbers */
>> if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
>> for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) {
>>- if (pdn->pe_num_map[i] != IODA_INVALID_PE)
>>- pnv_ioda_free_pe(phb, pdn->pe_num_map[i]);
>>+ if (pdn->pe_num_map[i] == IODA_INVALID_PE)
>>+ continue;
>>+
>>+ pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pdn->pe_num_map[i]];
>>+ pnv_ioda_free_pe(pe);
>> }
>> } else
>> bitmap_clear(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, *pdn->pe_num_map, num_vfs);
>>@@ -1354,9 +1358,8 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>
>> if (pnv_ioda_configure_pe(phb, pe)) {
>> /* XXX What do we do here ? */
>>- if (pe_num)
>>- pnv_ioda_free_pe(phb, pe_num);
>> pe->pdev = NULL;
>>+ pnv_ioda_free_pe(pe);
>
>
>
>pnv_ioda_free_pe() does WARN_ON(pdev). Before this patch you would free PE
>first and then reset pe->pdev, now you reset it first, then call
>pnv_ioda_free_pe(). This change is not just about "Use PE instead of number
>during setup and release", is/was that a bug?
>
>And I fail to see when pe->pdev could get initialized in
>pnv_ioda_configure_pe() as pnv_pci_dma_dev_setup() should not be called while
>pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE() is working.
>
It wasn't or isn't a bug as pe->pdev is initialized in arch/powerpc/platform/powernv/pci.c::
pnv_pci_dma_dev_setup()
>
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>>@@ -1374,6 +1377,7 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>> struct pci_bus *bus;
>> struct pci_controller *hose;
>> struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>> int ret;
>> u16 i;
>>@@ -1416,11 +1420,13 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>> /* Calculate available PE for required VFs */
>> if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
>> for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) {
>>- pdn->pe_num_map[i] = pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(phb);
>>- if (pdn->pe_num_map[i] == IODA_INVALID_PE) {
>>+ pe = pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(phb);
>>+ if (!pe) {
>> ret = -EBUSY;
>> goto m64_failed;
>> }
>>+
>>+ pdn->pe_num_map[i] = pe->pe_number;
>> }
>> } else {
>> mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
>>@@ -1465,8 +1471,11 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>> m64_failed:
>> if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
>> for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++) {
>>- if (pdn->pe_num_map[i] != IODA_INVALID_PE)
>>- pnv_ioda_free_pe(phb, pdn->pe_num_map[i]);
>>+ if (pdn->pe_num_map[i] == IODA_INVALID_PE)
>>+ continue;
>>+
>>+ pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pdn->pe_num_map[i]];
>>+ pnv_ioda_free_pe(pe);
>> }
>> } else
>> bitmap_clear(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, *pdn->pe_num_map, num_vfs);
>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>index 5df945f..e55ab0e 100644
>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>>@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct pnv_phb {
>> int (*init_m64)(struct pnv_phb *phb);
>> void (*reserve_m64_pe)(struct pci_bus *bus,
>> unsigned long *pe_bitmap, bool all);
>>- int (*pick_m64_pe)(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all);
>>+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *(*pick_m64_pe)(struct pci_bus *bus, bool all);
>> int (*get_pe_state)(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no);
>> void (*freeze_pe)(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no);
>> int (*unfreeze_pe)(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe_no, int opt);
>>
Thanks,
Gavin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-17 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 157+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-04 13:12 [PATCH v7 00/50] powerpc/powernv: PCI hotplug support Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 01/50] PCI: Add pcibios_setup_bridge() Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 02/50] powerpc/pci: Override pcibios_setup_bridge() Gavin Shan
2015-11-05 22:27 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-05 23:44 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 03/50] powerpc/pci: Cleanup on struct pci_controller_ops Gavin Shan
2015-11-05 22:32 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-05 23:45 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 04/50] powerpc/powernv: Cleanup on pnv_pci_ioda_controller_ops Gavin Shan
2015-11-05 22:28 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-06 1:09 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 05/50] powerpc/powernv: Drop pnv_ioda_setup_dev_PE() Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 06/50] powerpc/powernv: Drop phb->bdfn_to_pe() Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 07/50] powerpc/powernv: Reorder fields in struct pnv_phb Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 08/50] powerpc/powernv: Rename PE# " Gavin Shan
2015-11-16 8:01 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 1:22 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 09/50] powerpc/powernv: Fix initial IO and M32 segmap Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 10/50] powerpc/powernv: Simplify pnv_ioda_setup_pe_seg() Gavin Shan
2015-11-05 22:56 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-05 23:52 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-16 8:01 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 0:54 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 11/50] powerpc/powernv: IO and M32 mapping based on PCI device resources Gavin Shan
2015-11-12 3:30 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-12 4:55 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-16 8:01 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 1:33 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 12/50] powerpc/powernv: Track M64 segment consumption Gavin Shan
2015-11-12 4:18 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-16 8:01 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 1:04 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-19 0:10 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-23 22:42 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 13/50] powerpc/powernv: Rename M64 related functions Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 14/50] powerpc/powernv: M64 support on P7IOC Gavin Shan
2015-11-16 8:01 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 1:37 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-19 0:18 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-22 22:46 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-16 8:02 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 1:38 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 2:11 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 2:44 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-16 8:02 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 1:42 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 2:37 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 3:04 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 3:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-11-17 4:43 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 8:44 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 15/50] powerpc/powernv: Rename pnv_pci_ioda_setup_dma_pe() Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 16/50] powerpc/powernv: Define PNV_IODA1_DMA32_SEGSIZE Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 17/50] powerpc/powernv: Avoid calculating DMA32 segments on PHB3 Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 1:07 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 8:48 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 23:59 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 18/50] powerpc/powernv: Remove DMA32 PE list Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 1:54 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 2:01 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 19/50] powerpc/powernv: Track DMA32 segment consumption Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 0:28 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-17 1:55 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 20/50] powerpc/powernv: Improve DMA32 segment calculation Gavin Shan
2015-11-20 3:14 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 21/50] powerpc/powernv: Increase PE# capacity Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 0:29 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-17 1:56 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 22/50] powerpc/powernv: Introduce pnv_ioda_init_pe() Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 0:30 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-17 1:58 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 2:37 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 2:53 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 23/50] powerpc/powernv: Use PE instead of number during setup and release Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 5:08 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 9:03 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2015-11-18 0:13 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-22 22:52 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 24/50] powerpc/powernv: Allocate PE# in reverse order Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 25/50] powerpc/powernv: Reserve PE for root bus Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 6:04 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 9:06 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-19 0:21 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 26/50] powerpc/powernv: Create PEs at PCI hot plugging time Gavin Shan
2015-11-17 7:57 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-17 9:12 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 27/50] powerpc/powernv: Dynamically release PEs Gavin Shan
2015-11-18 2:23 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-23 23:06 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-24 0:22 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 28/50] powerpc/pci: Rename pcibios_{add, remove}_pci_devices() Gavin Shan
2015-11-18 2:43 ` [PATCH v7 28/50] powerpc/pci: Rename pcibios_{add,remove}_pci_devices() Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-23 23:08 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 29/50] powerpc/pci: Rename pcibios_find_pci_bus() Gavin Shan
2015-11-18 3:59 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-23 23:11 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 30/50] powerpc/pci: Move pci_find_bus_by_node() around Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 31/50] powerpc/pci: Export pci_add_device_node_info() Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 32/50] powerpc/pci: Introduce pci_remove_device_node_info() Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 33/50] powerpc/pci: Export pci_traverse_device_nodes() Gavin Shan
2015-11-18 3:14 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-23 23:23 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 34/50] powerpc/pci: Delay populating pdn Gavin Shan
2015-11-18 4:24 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-23 23:42 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 35/50] powerpc/pci: Don't scan empty slot Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 36/50] powerpc/pci: Update bridge windows on PCI plug Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 37/50] powerpc/powernv: Simplify pnv_eeh_reset() Gavin Shan
2015-11-12 5:11 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-12 6:11 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 38/50] powerpc/powernv: Exclude root bus in pnv_pci_reset_secondary_bus() Gavin Shan
2015-11-12 22:59 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-12 23:25 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 39/50] powerpc/powernv: Fundamental reset " Gavin Shan
2015-11-12 6:15 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-13 0:08 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-13 0:20 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-13 0:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-11-13 0:23 ` Daniel Axtens
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 40/50] powerpc/powernv: Support PCI slot ID Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 41/50] powerpc/powernv: Use firmware PCI slot reset infrastructure Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 42/50] powerpc/powernv: Functions to get/set PCI slot status Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 43/50] powerpc/powernv: Select OF_DYNAMIC Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 44/50] drivers/of: Split unflatten_dt_node() Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 18:43 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-04 23:05 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 45/50] drivers/of: Avoid recursively calling unflatten_dt_node() Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 16:07 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-04 23:23 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 23:26 ` Gavin Shan
2016-05-13 7:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-05-13 11:31 ` [PATCH] drivers/of: Fix build warning in populate_node() Gavin Shan
2016-05-16 14:11 ` Rob Herring
2015-12-06 20:28 ` [PATCH v7 45/50] drivers/of: Avoid recursively calling unflatten_dt_node() Rob Herring
2015-12-06 21:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-06 23:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-12-07 2:21 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-07 2:33 ` Rob Herring
2015-12-07 3:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 46/50] drivers/of: Rename unflatten_dt_node() Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 47/50] drivers/of: Specify parent node in of_fdt_unflatten_tree() Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 48/50] drivers/of: Return allocated memory from of_fdt_unflatten_tree() Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 49/50] drivers/of: Export OF changeset functions Gavin Shan
2015-11-04 16:12 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-04 23:23 ` Gavin Shan
2016-01-13 13:54 ` [v7,49/50] " Wolfram Sang
2016-01-13 21:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-01-13 21:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-01-13 23:53 ` Rob Herring
2016-01-14 7:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-11-04 13:12 ` [PATCH v7 50/50] PCI/hotplug: PowerPC PowerNV PCI hotplug driver Gavin Shan
2015-11-18 7:33 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2015-11-23 23:16 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-09 3:09 ` [PATCH v7 00/50] powerpc/powernv: PCI hotplug support Gavin Shan
2015-11-09 4:24 ` Pramod Sudheendra
2015-11-09 4:29 ` Gavin Shan
2015-11-09 6:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151117090302.GD16586@gwshan \
--to=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=panto@antoniou-consulting.com \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).