linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"James E. J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@odin.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, brking <brking@us.ibm.com>,
	tom.leiming@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1096!
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:43:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151123151330.GA10990@dhcppc13.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56531B3F.60503@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 23/11/2015:02:57:19 PM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> On 23/11/2015 00:20, Mark Salter wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 00:56 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:30:14 +0100
> >> Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 20/11/2015 13:10, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 00:23 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> It's pretty much guaranteed a block layer bug, most likely in the
> >>>>> merge bios to request infrastucture where we don't obey the merging
> >>>>> limits properly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Does either of you have a known good and first known bad kernel?
> >>>>
> >>>> Not me, I've only hit it one or two times. All I can say is I have hit it in
> >>>> 4.4-rc1.
> >>>>
> >>>> Laurent, can you narrow it down at all?
> >>>
> >>> It seems that the panic is triggered by the commit bdced438acd8 ("block:
> >>> setup bi_phys_segments after splitting") which has been pulled by the
> >>> merge d9734e0d1ccf ("Merge branch 'for-4.4/core' of
> >>> git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block").
> >>>
> >>> My system is panicing promptly when running a kernel built at
> >>> d9734e0d1ccf, while reverting the commit bdced438acd8, it can run hours
> >>> without panicing.
> >>>
> >>> This being said, I can't explain what's going wrong.
> >>>
> >>> May Ming shed some light here ?
> >>
> >> Laurent, looks there is one bug in blk_bio_segment_split(), would you
> >> mind testing the following patch to see if it fixes your issue?
> >>
> >> ---
> >> From 6fc701231dcc000bc8bc4b9105583380d9aa31f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> >> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 00:47:13 +0800
> >> Subject: [PATCH] block: fix segment split
> >>
> >> Inside blk_bio_segment_split(), previous bvec pointer('bvprvp')
> >> always points to the iterator local variable, which is obviously
> >> wrong, so fix it by pointing to the local variable of 'bvprv'.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
> >> ---
> >>  block/blk-merge.c | 4 ++--
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> >> index de5716d8..f2efe8a 100644
> >> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> >> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> >> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
> >>  
> >>  			seg_size += bv.bv_len;
> >>  			bvprv = bv;
> >> -			bvprvp = &bv;
> >> +			bvprvp = &bvprv;
> >>  			sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
> >>  			continue;
> >>  		}
> >> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ new_segment:
> >>  
> >>  		nsegs++;
> >>  		bvprv = bv;
> >> -		bvprvp = &bv;
> >> +		bvprvp = &bvprv;
> >>  		seg_size = bv.bv_len;
> >>  		sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
> >>  	}
> > 
> > I'm still hitting the BUG even with this patch applied on top of 4.4-rc1.
> 
> On my side, with the patch applied on top of 4.4-rc1, I can't get the
> panic anymore.

git bisect shows:

bdced438acd83ad83a6c6fc7f50099b820245ddb is the first bad commit
commit bdced438acd83ad83a6c6fc7f50099b820245ddb
Author: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 20 23:13:52 2015 +0800 

    block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting

Reverting above commit on top if 4.4-rc1 seems to fix the problem for me.

~Pratyush

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-23 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-18  9:18 kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1096! Michael Ellerman
2015-11-18 11:06 ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-18 11:10   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-11-18 11:17     ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-18 14:03 ` Mark Salter
2015-11-19  1:02   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-11-19  8:23     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-19 15:35       ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-20 14:38         ` Ewan Milne
2015-11-20 14:55           ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-20 15:28             ` Ewan Milne
2015-11-23  6:55               ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-25  9:04               ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-25 17:56                 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-25 19:10                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-25 19:24                     ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-25 20:23                       ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-25 21:20                         ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-25 18:01                 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-25 19:01                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-12-04 16:59                     ` Takashi Iwai
2015-12-04 17:02                       ` Jens Axboe
2015-12-04 17:09                         ` Takashi Iwai
2015-11-20 12:10       ` Michael Ellerman
2015-11-20 12:56         ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-20 13:37           ` Mark Salter
2015-11-21 11:30         ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-21 16:56           ` Ming Lei
2015-11-22 23:20             ` Mark Salter
2015-11-23  0:36               ` Ming Lei
2015-11-23  1:50                 ` Mark Salter
2015-11-23  2:46                   ` Ming Lei
2015-11-23 15:21                     ` Ming Lei
2015-11-24 18:59                       ` Alan Ott
2015-11-23 13:57               ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-23 15:13                 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2015-11-23 15:20                   ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-23 15:27                     ` Ming Lei
2015-11-23 16:24                       ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-24  1:30                       ` Mark Salter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151123151330.GA10990@dhcppc13.redhat.com \
    --to=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=JBottomley@odin.com \
    --cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).