From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2B71A04EB for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:02:33 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:02:30 -0800 From: Andi Kleen To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: mingo@redhat.com, Michael Ellerman , Jiri Olsa , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , namhyung@kernel.org, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 00/19] perf, tools: Add support for PMU events in JSON format Message-ID: <20151203210230.GC18534@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1448938635-29176-1-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1448938635-29176-1-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:56:55PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > CPUs support a large number of performance monitoring events (PMU events) > and often these events are very specific to an architecture/model of the > CPU. To use most of these PMU events with perf, we currently have to identify > them by their raw codes: Could this patch be merged please? I'm not aware of any open objection to it, and it has been already extensively reviewed in the past. Full event lists are very useful for people. Also there are additional changes (uncore event lists) which are blocked on these patches getting merged. Thanks, -Andi