From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: add FSL_SOC dependency to drivers using FSL_LBC
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 12:45:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160107204520.GK109450@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452199237.19133.26.camel@freescale.com>
Hi Scott,
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:40:37PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 12:34 -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 01:47:33PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 11:21 -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > > I've managed to construct .config files (for ppc64) that come across
> > > > this Kconfig warning:
> > > >
> > > > warning: (MPC836x_RDK && MTD_NAND_FSL_ELBC && MTD_NAND_FSL_UPM)
> > > > selects
> > > > FSL_LBC which has unmet direct dependencies (FSL_SOC)
> > > >
> > > > Let's add the FSL_SOC dependency to the NAND drivers. AFAICT, they are
> > > > only supported on PPC32 FSL SoCs anyway.
> > >
> > > There are other problems, if you can enable an 83xx board on ppc64.
> > > PPC_83xx
> > > does select FSL_SOC so I don't know why it's unmet.
> >
> > I don't have an 83xx board enabled. I just have MTD_NAND_FSL_ELBC
> > enabled; it only depends on PPC right now. Attaching the current test
> > .config, for clarity.
>
> Where did MPC836x_RDK come from above?
I believe that Kconfig warning is misleading. Seems like it should be
saying '||' instead of '&&'. I did not have MPC836x_RDK or
MTD_NAND_FSL_UPM in my .config; only MTD_NAND_FSL_ELBC=y. (Check the
attachment from my previous mail to be sure.)
Regards,
Brian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-07 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-07 19:21 [PATCH] mtd: nand: add FSL_SOC dependency to drivers using FSL_LBC Brian Norris
2016-01-07 19:47 ` Scott Wood
2016-01-07 20:34 ` Brian Norris
2016-01-07 20:40 ` Scott Wood
2016-01-07 20:45 ` Brian Norris [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160107204520.GK109450@google.com \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).