From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5753F1A196A for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:04:34 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 13:04:21 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andy Whitcroft , Joe Perches , Peter Zijlstra , Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Cooper , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Stefano Stabellini , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , David Miller , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, x86@kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Ingo Molnar , Tony Lindgren , Julian Calaby , Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers Message-ID: <20160111130334-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1452509968-19778-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1452509968-19778-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:59:25PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset > extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop > incorrect memory barrier usage. > > This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series > arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt > and will be included in the pull request including > the series. > > changes from v3: > rename smp_barrier_stems to barrier_stems > as suggested by Julian Calaby. In fact it was Joe Perches that suggested it. Sorry about the confusion. > add (?: ... ) around a variable in regexp, > in case we change the value later so that it matters. > changes from v2: > address comments by Joe Perches: > use (?: ... ) to avoid unnecessary capture groups > rename smp_barriers to smp_barrier_stems for clarity > add barriers before/after atomic > Changes from v1: > catch optional\s* before () in barriers > rewrite using qr{} instead of map > > Michael S. Tsirkin (3): > checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers > checkpatch: check for __smp outside barrier.h > checkpatch: add virt barriers > > Michael S. Tsirkin (3): > checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers > checkpatch: check for __smp outside barrier.h > checkpatch: add virt barriers > > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > -- > MST