linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
To: Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, agraf@suse.de, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: PPC: Exit guest upon MCE when FWNMI capability is enabled
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:28:47 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160123102847.GB11916@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160113070809.20248.80811.stgit@aravindap>

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:38:09PM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
> Enhance KVM to cause a guest exit with KVM_EXIT_NMI
> exit reasons upon a machine check exception (MCE) in
> the guest address space if the KVM_CAP_PPC_FWNMI
> capability is enabled (instead of delivering 0x200
> interrupt to guest). This enables QEMU to build error
> log and deliver machine check exception to guest via
> guest registered machine check handler.
> 
> This approach simplifies the delivering of machine
> check exception to guest OS compared to the earlier
> approach of KVM directly invoking 0x200 guest interrupt
> vector. In the earlier approach QEMU was enhanced to
> patch the 0x200 interrupt vector during boot. The
> patched code at 0x200 issued a private hcall to pass
> the control to QEMU to build the error log.
> 
> This design/approach is based on the feedback for the
> QEMU patches to handle machine check exception. Details
> of earlier approach of handling machine check exception
> in QEMU and related discussions can be found at:

[snip]

> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> @@ -133,21 +133,18 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>  	stb	r0, HSTATE_HWTHREAD_REQ(r13)
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * For external and machine check interrupts, we need
> -	 * to call the Linux handler to process the interrupt.
> -	 * We do that by jumping to absolute address 0x500 for
> -	 * external interrupts, or the machine_check_fwnmi label
> -	 * for machine checks (since firmware might have patched
> -	 * the vector area at 0x200).  The [h]rfid at the end of the
> -	 * handler will return to the book3s_hv_interrupts.S code.
> -	 * For other interrupts we do the rfid to get back
> -	 * to the book3s_hv_interrupts.S code here.
> +	 * For external interrupts we need to call the Linux
> +	 * handler to process the interrupt. We do that by jumping
> +	 * to absolute address 0x500 for external interrupts.
> +	 * The [h]rfid at the end of the handler will return to
> +	 * the book3s_hv_interrupts.S code. For other interrupts
> +	 * we do the rfid to get back to the book3s_hv_interrupts.S
> +	 * code here.
>  	 */
>  	ld	r8, 112+PPC_LR_STKOFF(r1)
>  	addi	r1, r1, 112
>  	ld	r7, HSTATE_HOST_MSR(r13)
>  
> -	cmpwi	cr1, r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>  	cmpwi	r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_EXTERNAL
>  	beq	11f
>  	cmpwi	r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_H_DOORBELL
> @@ -162,7 +159,6 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>  	mtmsrd	r6, 1			/* Clear RI in MSR */
>  	mtsrr0	r8
>  	mtsrr1	r7
> -	beq	cr1, 13f		/* machine check */
>  	RFI
>  
>  	/* On POWER7, we have external interrupts set to use HSRR0/1 */
> @@ -170,8 +166,6 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
>  	mtspr	SPRN_HSRR1, r7
>  	ba	0x500
>  
> -13:	b	machine_check_fwnmi
> -

So, what you're disabling here is the host-side handling of the
machine check after completing the guest->host switch.  This has
nothing to do with how the machine check gets communicated to the
guest.

Now, part of the host-side machine check handling has already
happened, but I thought there was more that was done in host kernel
virtual mode.  If this change really is needed then I would want an
ack from Mahesh that this is correct, and it will need to be explained
in detail in the patch description.

>  14:	mtspr	SPRN_HSRR0, r8
>  	mtspr	SPRN_HSRR1, r7
>  	b	hmi_exception_after_realmode
> @@ -2390,15 +2384,13 @@ machine_check_realmode:
>  	ld	r9, HSTATE_KVM_VCPU(r13)
>  	li	r12, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>  	/*
> -	 * Deliver unhandled/fatal (e.g. UE) MCE errors to guest through
> -	 * machine check interrupt (set HSRR0 to 0x200). And for handled
> -	 * errors (no-fatal), just go back to guest execution with current
> -	 * HSRR0 instead of exiting guest. This new approach will inject
> -	 * machine check to guest for fatal error causing guest to crash.
> -	 *
> -	 * The old code used to return to host for unhandled errors which
> -	 * was causing guest to hang with soft lockups inside guest and
> -	 * makes it difficult to recover guest instance.
> +	 * Deliver unhandled/fatal (e.g. UE) MCE errors to guest either
> +	 * through machine check interrupt (set HSRR0 to 0x200) or by
> +	 * exiting the guest with KVM_EXIT_NMI exit reason if guest is
> +	 * FWNMI capable. For handled errors (no-fatal), just go back
> +	 * to guest execution with current HSRR0. This new approach
> +	 * injects machine check errors in guest address space to guest
> +	 * enabling guest kernel to suitably handle such errors.
>  	 *
>  	 * if we receive machine check with MSR(RI=0) then deliver it to
>  	 * guest as machine check causing guest to crash.
> @@ -2408,11 +2400,17 @@ machine_check_realmode:
>  	beq	1f			/* Deliver a machine check to guest */
>  	ld	r10, VCPU_PC(r9)
>  	cmpdi	r3, 0		/* Did we handle MCE ? */
> -	bne	2f	/* Continue guest execution. */
> +	bne	3f	/* Continue guest execution. */
>  	/* If not, deliver a machine check.  SRR0/1 are already set */
> -1:	li	r10, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
> +1:  /* Check if guest is capable of handling NMI exit */
> +	ld  r3, VCPU_KVM(r9)

Tab between opcode and first operand please, and also in the following
lines.

> +	lbz  r3, KVM_FWNMI(r3)
> +	cmpdi   r3, 1       /* FWNMI capable? */
> +	bne 2f
> +	b   mc_cont

Why not just beq mc_cont rather than the bne 2f; b mc_cont?

> +2:	li	r10, BOOK3S_INTERRUPT_MACHINE_CHECK
>  	bl	kvmppc_msr_interrupt
> -2:	b	fast_interrupt_c_return
> +3:	b	fast_interrupt_c_return

Paul.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-23 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-13  7:07 [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: PPC: New capability to control MCE behaviour Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-13  7:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: PPC: Exit guest upon MCE when FWNMI capability is enabled Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-14  0:06   ` David Gibson
2016-01-23 10:28   ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2016-01-23 12:53     ` Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-23 21:24       ` Paul Mackerras
2016-01-25  8:39         ` Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-27  5:02         ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2016-06-20  5:18   ` Paul Mackerras
2016-06-21 21:01     ` Aravinda Prasad
2016-01-14  0:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] KVM: PPC: New capability to control MCE behaviour David Gibson
2016-01-14  0:05   ` David Gibson
2016-01-23 10:20 ` Paul Mackerras
2016-01-23 12:28   ` Aravinda Prasad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160123102847.GB11916@fergus.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=paulus@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=aravinda@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).