linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@tabi.org>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
	Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_ssi: remove explicit register defaults
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 21:37:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160201213728.GH4455@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56AFCE8D.70804@maciej.szmigiero.name>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 571 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:30:53PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 01.02.2016 22:10, Mark Brown wrote:

> > No, that's completely broken.  We can't do a raw read from a regmap that
> > doesn't offer raw access and we shouldn't pretend to do so.  If the
> > caller is capable of substituting a register by register read the caller
> > should take responsibility for that.

> So can regcache initialization be changed to use register by register read
> in case raw read fails?

Well, we *do* have full source code access!  I'm just blind writing a
patch to do that.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-01 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-18 19:07 [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_ssi: remove explicit register defaults Maciej S. Szmigiero
2016-01-18 22:14 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-02-01 12:05 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-02-01 12:07   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2016-02-01 12:13     ` Fabio Estevam
2016-02-01 12:25       ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2016-02-01 16:58         ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2016-02-01 21:10           ` Mark Brown
2016-02-01 21:30             ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2016-02-01 21:34               ` Fabio Estevam
2016-02-01 21:37               ` Mark Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160201213728.GH4455@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
    --cc=timur@tabi.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).