From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842F21A0065 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:04:37 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:04:35 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: David Rientjes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net, Joonsoo Kim , davej@codemonkey.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86: query dynamic DEBUG_PAGEALLOC setting Message-Id: <20160202150435.60076ce1d603a99c17c08edf@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <56B12FBE.3070909@de.ibm.com> References: <1453889401-43496-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <1453889401-43496-3-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <56A9E3D1.3090001@de.ibm.com> <56B12560.4010201@de.ibm.com> <20160202142157.1bfc6f81807faaa026957917@linux-foundation.org> <56B12FBE.3070909@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 23:37:50 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 02/02/2016 11:21 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 22:53:36 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > >>>> I don't think we should have a CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC that does some stuff > >>>> and then a commandline parameter or CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT > >>>> to enable more stuff. It should either be all enabled by the commandline > >>>> (or config option) or split into a separate entity. > >>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_LIGHT and CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC would be fine, but > >>>> the current state is very confusing about what is being done and what > >>>> isn't. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Ping? > >>> > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/29/266 > > > > That's already in linux-next so I can't apply it. > > > > Well, I can, but it's a hassle. What's happening here? > > I pushed it on my tree for kbuild testing purposes some days ago. > Will drop so that it can go via mm. There are other patches that I haven't merged because they were already in -next. In fact I think I dropped them because they later popped up in -next. Some or all of: lib-spinlock_debugc-prevent-an-infinite-recursive-cycle-in-spin_dump.patch mm-provide-debug_pagealloc_enabled-without-config_debug_pagealloc.patch x86-query-dynamic-debug_pagealloc-setting.patch s390-query-dynamic-debug_pagealloc-setting.patch mm-provide-debug_pagealloc_enabled-without-config_debug_pagealloc.patch x86-query-dynamic-debug_pagealloc-setting.patch s390-query-dynamic-debug_pagealloc-setting.patch So please resend everything which you think is needed.