From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D44AB1A0190 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 21:32:48 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 11:32:43 +0100 From: Torsten Duwe To: Petr Mladek Cc: Steven Rostedt , Michael Ellerman , Jiri Kosina , Miroslav Benes , Jessica Yu , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/10] ppc64 ftrace_with_regs configuration variables Message-ID: <20160206103243.GB3130@lst.de> References: <20160204161527.5F3AC692CD@newverein.lst.de> <20160204162053.C76A7692D8@newverein.lst.de> <20160205140517.GE3305@pathway.suse.cz> <20160205094803.1e0c6c91@gandalf.local.home> <20160205161834.GF731@pathway.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20160205161834.GF731@pathway.suse.cz> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: [...] > more complicated. Whem I think about it, the change below does similar > job and looks more strightforwad: Had I only looked closer. That's exactly how I thought it would work in the first place. I'd call that a fix. Full ACK from my side. Torsten