linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: jeyu@redhat.com, jkosina@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
	mbenes@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v4] livepatch/ppc: Enable livepatching on powerpc
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 12:14:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308111423.GB16502@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160304192222.GA31341@lst.de>

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:22:22PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 07:16:57PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:01:37PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > 
> > > Do I understand it correctly that we could not patch functions that
> > > pass arguments on the stack with this implementation? If yes, how hard
> > > would be to get it working, please? At least, it would be great to
> > > catch this problem and handle it with grace. Otherwise, it might
> > > be hard to debug.
> > 
> > No, those functions only require special attention.
> 
> So far it's correct. It's been a while since I wrote that code.
> 
> > I needed _any_ location to store the caller's TOC;
> > and the stack is thread-safe and recursion-safe.
> > The current caller's frame is already full so I had
> > to create a new one.
> 
> Correction: the TOC can be stored in the caller's stack frame at
> the usual location. Only the restore instruction is a problem.

Another correction :-( This is true only for local calls

    -*> Which become *global* calls due to live patching <*-

For callers that made a global call to the patched function originally,
they already _have_ stored their TOC value there, and the r2 they enter
ftrace caller with is bogus.

I see no way to determine which is the case, so my code preserves both:
24(r1) in the caller's frame is left untouched. R2, as it came, is saved in
the mini stack frame, as well as the caller's return address (LR,
shifted 1 frame). Remember, LR got modified to point to klp_return_helper.

Removing this auxiliary stack frame causes even more problems than it solves.

> So one solution could be to call the patch function via a small
> trampoline or pre-prologue that just pops that frame, and have
> the patch function restore R2 manually at the end.

I'll try to demonstrate that. It's not so hard. And klp_return_helper will
do the right thing for >90% of all function replacements automatically.

> Sorry for the confusion,

Once more.

	Torsten

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-08 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-03 16:52 [PATCH][v4] livepatch/ppc: Enable livepatching on powerpc Petr Mladek
2016-03-03 20:43 ` Balbir Singh
2016-03-04  6:08 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-03-04  7:58 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-03-04  9:31   ` Miroslav Benes
2016-03-07  3:29     ` Michael Ellerman
2016-03-04  8:06 ` How to merge? (was Re: [PATCH][v4] livepatch/ppc: Enable livepatching on powerpc) Michael Ellerman
2016-03-04  8:56   ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-07 10:06     ` Michael Ellerman
2016-03-07 22:52       ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-07 23:20         ` Michael Ellerman
2016-03-08  1:53           ` Steven Rostedt
2016-03-07 23:22         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-04 12:42 ` [PATCH][v4] livepatch/ppc: Enable livepatching on powerpc Torsten Duwe
2016-03-04 13:01   ` Petr Mladek
2016-03-04 18:16     ` Torsten Duwe
2016-03-04 19:22       ` Torsten Duwe
2016-03-08 11:14         ` Torsten Duwe [this message]
2016-03-06 23:55   ` Balbir Singh
2016-03-04 21:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-03-08 21:42 ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160308111423.GB16502@lst.de \
    --to=duwe@lst.de \
    --cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).