From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 914741A009A for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:15:50 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com (e23smtp07.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64F9B140328 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:15:50 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost by e23smtp07.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 08:15:49 +1000 Received: from d23relay10.au.ibm.com (d23relay10.au.ibm.com [9.190.26.77]) by d23dlp02.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1682BB0055 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:15:46 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay10.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u28MFbgO9175394 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:15:46 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u28MFCvO024698 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:15:13 +1100 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:14:47 +1100 From: Gavin Shan To: Andrew Donnellan Cc: Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Gavin Shan , Daniel Axtens Subject: Re: powerpc/eeh: eeh_pci_enable(): fix checking of post-request state Message-ID: <20160308221447.GA4838@gwshan> Reply-To: Gavin Shan References: <20160208113706.12246140B99@ozlabs.org> <56B92B74.8040108@au1.ibm.com> <56DE8280.6020302@au1.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <56DE8280.6020302@au1.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:42:56PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote: >On 09/02/16 10:57, Andrew Donnellan wrote: >>It is a fix - I'm a bit hazy on the details now but IIRC, Daniel Axtens >>and I encountered this when doing some cxl debugging, though I think we >>decided not to tag this for stable since it was a secondary issue to the >>primary bug we were looking for. It probably could go to stable though? >>(Daniel - thoughts?) >> >>The line in question was last touched in 4d4f577e4b5e, but it looks like >>the behaviour wasn't right even before that. > >Ping :) > >I think this patch should still go in, I don't really care whether it goes to >stable or not. > Andrew, I lost the context about this. If you need any helps like review, please ping me from IRC. Thanks, Gavin >-- >Andrew Donnellan Software Engineer, OzLabs >andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com Australia Development Lab, Canberra >+61 2 6201 8874 (work) IBM Australia Limited