From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3qT6jx2KCPzDq7K for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:23:01 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from mail-pf0-x22c.google.com (mail-pf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3qT6jw5gWmz9s3s for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:23:00 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id x3so254778747pfb.1 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 00:23:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:52:55 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Shilpasri G Bhat Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, pc@us.ibm.com, shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com, anton@samba.org, mikey@neuling.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Define per_cpu chip pointer to optimize hot-path Message-ID: <20160321072255.GB1803@vireshk-i7> References: <1458274308.6622.79.camel@neuling.org> <1458313100-27676-1-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1458313100-27676-1-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 18-03-16, 20:28, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote: > From: Michael Neuling > > "cpufreq: powernv: Remove cpu_to_chip_id() from hot-path" introduced If the patch is already committed, you should provide its commit id as well. > 'core_to_chip_map' array to cache the chip-id of all cores. Replace > this with per_cpu variable that stores the pointer to the chip-array. > This removes the linear lookup and provides a neater and simpler > solution. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling > Tested-by: Shilpasri G Bhat You are sending this patch and you have updated it as well.. So, you should have had your signed-off here. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar -- viresh